Tag: cyberbullies

Facebook Violates Its Own Community Standards Allowing Rampant Cyberstalking & Harassment Of Activists

Facebook Violates Its Own Community Standards Allowing Rampant Cyberstalking & Harassment Of Activists

Fakebook

Friend or faux?

Despite facebook’s rigidly enforced real name policy, there are literally hundreds (if not thousands) of fake profiles & pages created by sock puppets, (shills; hired infiltrators, TROLLS), that are allowed to remain on facebook to harass people.

Shills create fake pages to impersonate activists, gang-stalk report activists, and spread disinformation as an attempt to influence public perception, also to prevent public outcry for the corporations they shill for.  Even after multiple reports by honest people that alert facebook to the problem, the shills (trolls) are allowed to remain; while activists using legitimate pen names, such as Rebel Siren, as well as other people using alternate names for various reasons such as personal safety or a nickname they’ve gone by their entire lives, immediately get suspended.

Facebook’s “real name” policy is supposedly designed to prevent “bad behavior“, such as dishonesty and deception; which is not an issue with good people no matter what their name, especially well meaning activists seeking to raise awareness and share information for a safer, healthier world! The bottom line is, disinformation shills a.k.a. trolls are exploiting facebook’s real name policy and getting away with it.

Oh, the irony!

Instead of agreeing to conduct a proper investigation, facebook merely suspends/removes activists’ profiles while allowing the disinformation shills whose mission it is to target and harass activists, a.k.a. cyber-stalking, to run rampant attacking honest people. “Bad behavior” as defined by using “fake names” according to facebook policy, is most definitely an issue with the disinformation shills a.k.a. trolls who routinely exhibit the worst of it on social media, yet are allowed to remain and run rampant with whatever names they use, whether fake or “real”.

The trolls are allowed to continue with relentless cyber-bullying and harassment, despite multiple reports made on them. How difficult is it to get a profile suspended by reporting it? For activists, it’s nearly impossible. We report those that target and harass us repeatedly, without success, always with the same message, it “does not violate facebook’s community standards”. For the trolls, it seems easy, they make one report and it’s down that day, but why is that? What do the trolls have that honest people don’t? Corporate backing? Unlimited funding? An insider-facebook aide abusing their job to assist them? We can only speculate.

The disinformation shills a.k.a. TROLLS chose to sell out humanity in favor of dirty energy, Monsanto/GMOs, geoengineering, fracking, vaccines, false flag deceit, and the list goes on, hired as “forum posters” by corporate contracted public relations companies, creating profiles for the sole purpose of perpetuating corporate deceit by targeting and harassing outspoken activists, yet these trolls are allowed to remain unchecked on facebook (and youtube), while decent people trying to make a difference get raked over the coals. As outlined in Dispelling Internet Disinformation Tactics – Debunking The Debunkers the tactics used by these fake profiles & pages are indeed relentless forms of cyberstalking & harassment that clearly falls into the category of “bad behavior”. So then, why would facebook enforce its “real name” policy, yet allow truly fake profiles/pages to continue harassing people? (Hence, the nickname, “fakebook“).

For example, there were FAKE “Rebel Siren” pages that have been reported SEVERAL times and others, as well as having been banned from the real Rebel Siren page. The FAKE “Rebel Siren” pages had been created by disinformation shills a.k.a. TROLLS, for the purpose of harassing and impersonating, in an attempt to discredit & “destroy the reputation of”, also known as the tactic of “character assassination“.

The trolls that had created FAKE “Rebel Siren” pages used unauthorized copies of Rebel Siren’s real profile picture and cover photo, and went so far as to mirror posts to confuse & trick people. The fake pages have only known trolls with fake profiles themselves “liking” it, except for some people that had been deceived.

Trolls with fake names such as “Randall Flagga Stephen King character (see end). Not only is it FAKE, it’s a copyright violation, yet “Randall Flagg” has been allowed to run free on facebook harassing activists, despite being reported multiple times: The CULT – Jim Jones’ disciples had nothing on these facebook trolls. Even more frustrating, the FAKE “Rebel Sirens” remained on facebook, while the legitimate Rebel Siren profile was indefinitely suspended; further meaning that the REAL page, Rebel Siren, was left vulnerable to troll attacks, such as by a TROLL illegally using the copyrighted Muppet characterBeaker (a “page” with 2 likes, not the official Muppet page), an OBVIOUS fake (been since deleted).

ALL troll attacks on the real Rebel Siren page including disparaging memes, insults, name calling, ridicule, and general harassment during the time of profile suspension at the date of this blog, had been cataloged to be used as further EVIDENCE against “fakebook” for allowing such shillidiocy, cyberstalking, and harassment to run unchecked.

Facebook seems to willingly allow FAKE troll profiles/pages to run amok, yet immediately suspends real profiles based solely on “name” regardless of the truth, and failing to take into account post & comment history.

It is highly irresponsible of facebook to enforce its “real name” policy, and suspend profiles with no investigation into the facts, as well as blatantly disregarding potential consequences of forcing people to use legal names, opening them up to identity theft, in-person harassment, and possibly bodily harm from unbalanced obsessive stalkers, and in some cases where domestic violence was a factor, stalking and abuse from ex husbands or boyfriends. It also makes facebook liable.

Troll attacks happened on Rebel Siren’s page during the time of suspension such as a troll using a fake name, “Beaker”. It was reported via screenshot and email to facebook in detail, yet they had refused to acknowledge it, while Rebel Siren’s profile continued to remain suspended, and every new Rebel Siren profile got suspended also. What gives?

Clearly, facebook violates its own “community standard” by allowing such things as a heartbreakingsnuff video” of kitten torture (highly disturbing video of two psychopathic deviates torturing an innocent kitten, dousing it with lighter fluid,  setting it on fire, then murdering it, too heinous to include in this article), various other shameful animal abuse and inappropriate psychopathic content.

Facebook routinely allows FAKES (such as known disinformation shills) to run rampant, while suspending real people using other names. For example, in the news recently, the LGBT community recently received an apology by facebook recently for attempting to force them to use their “real names” after some homophobic hater, (probably using a fake name himself), reported them. The LGBT community didn’t just bend over and take it, they spoke up and started a petition at change.org collecting 35,000 signatures, giving rise to the apology from facebook’s Cox:

Facebook apologizes to LGBT community over ‘real’ name policy Source: http://straightfromthea.com/2014/10/02/facebook-fail-drag-queens-targeted-for-deletion-receive-apology1/ Facebook has long required its users to go by their “real names” on the site for security purposes, to stand out from other social networks and so it can better target advertising to people. Now, the company says the spirit of its policy doesn’t mean a person’s legal name but “the authentic name they use in real life.

This begs the question, isn’t it blatant discrimination to allow some users to go ahead and use “other” names, while forcing the rest of us to submit legal identification and use “real names” despite the fact that we are known for our pen names, nicknames, maiden names, stage names, and business names? Even with all the recent controversy, discrimination, and overall unfairness of facebook’s so called “real name” policy and the public apologies to the LGBT community publicized in the news recently; Rebel Siren, author and advocate for humanity, remained disallowed to use a legitimate, proven PEN NAME on the profile.

Instead of further pursuing the matter with low level employees named, “Arnold” and “Barry” that were virtually unresponsive; only capable of generic responses, refusing to investigate and failing to honor several written requests to be routed to facebook’s legal department. “Fakebook’s” duplicitous actions are being exposed in this article with hopes it will raise awareness about the ongoing dissonance with facebook’s ever-changing user-unfriendly “policies” and generate a more positive outcome for everyone that’s forced to deal with this utter absurdity. Since the initial date of this article, facebook’s legal department has been contacted and apprised of the situation, including being cc’d on all future correspondence regarding this serious issue of rampant cyberbulling of activists.

What motivates facebook to allow rampant harassment by obvious fake profiles/pages (whether it looks like a “real name” or not), yet take readily “suspend” those of us that actually care about life and the world we live in and speak up in hopes of making a difference? Obviously, there is money involved. Why would facebook admit to such blatant discrimination by publicly apologizing to the LGBT community that’s been all over the news agreeing to allow them to use their “stage names”, yet blatantly IGNORE everyone else, including those of us seeking to raise awareness about global issues that affects all life on this planet?

If facebook allows one group of people to use other names, (such as the LGBT community), then facebook must allow everyone to do so, otherwise it’s pure discrimination, unfair to all users, not to mention that their “real name” policy is proving to be an epic fail, and that is only ONE element to this complex issue, there is also an issue of SAFETY. Facebook is jeopardizing activist’s safety, as well as other people whose safety may be at risk if they use their “real names”. Is facebook “bought” by corporate interests, or holding to an inept policy, or BOTH?

Obviously, “names”, whether fake OR real, do not keep cyberbullying off of facebook. Why does facebook choose to perpetuate cyberbullying by honoring the reports of known trolls that target and relentlessly harass activists, yet ignore the reports and pleas of real people that are trying to make a difference? Is there justice in allowing cyberbullies with fake profiles & pages to run rampant, but honest people to get the boot simply based on the fact that they had been targeted & reported by cyberbullies? What is facebook’s policy about disclosing the reports and investigating those that do the reporting to see if they are hiding anything or on a revenge mission? Will it take legal action to get this out into the open?

Meanwhile, perhaps facebook should reevaluate its inefficient, generic “policies” and come up with a better way of identifying truly fake profiles that are actual cyberbullies, such as an investigatory overview of comment and posting history (which was requested in writing several times), rather than focusing solely on “names”. It is evident that examining someone’s ACTUAL behavior on facebook would be a much better gauge of WHO they are than simply what their “name” happens to be. Honestly, and quite ironically, using the pen name Rebel Siren, allows this author to be more professional and objective in posts & comments on facebook. If forced to use a given name, posts would be much more emotional and unrestrained, just as they were prior to using pen name only. Certainly seems like a backfire waiting to happen, eh facebook? For those of us with common sense and the ability for critical thinking, let’s examine the growing problem of rampant, widespread cyberbullies in more detail:

Technology’s progression is often equated with the advancement of human societies. Pivotal innovations, such as the Internet, have forever changed how people interact. Though these developments have allowed the human race to make great strides in many fields, they have also allowed forms of transgression to become more rampant and widespread. This is evident when considering how traditional bullying has evolved into an issue today known as cyberbullying. While bullying and cyberbullying are often similar in terms of form and technique they also have many differences. Unlike traditional bullying, cyberbullying allows the offender to mask his or her identity behind a computer. This anonymity makes it easier for the offender to strike blows against a victim without having to see the victim’s physical response. The distancing effect that technological devices have on today’s youth often leads them to say and do crueler things compared to what is typical in a traditional face-to-face bullying situation. Source: https://www.elon.edu/docs/e-web/academics/communications/research/vol3no1/04DoneganEJSpring12.pdf

Let’s take a look at another negative situation facebook has brought upon itself due to its irresponsible, revolving door policies and ongoing privacy infringement.

An Austrian law student says more than 17,000 people have signed up to join his class action lawsuit against Facebook over the social media group’s alleged violations of its users’ privacy. Twenty-six year-old Max Schrems appealed last week to a billion Facebook users to join a claim he filed in Vienna. – Source:  http://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-austria-lawsuit-idUSKBN0N019420150409

Upon further investigation into facebook faux pas, we discover that “real names” can cause even bigger problems on “fakebook”. Facebook further contradicted its  “real name” policy, violating its own “community standards”,  by allowing the DEA to create a fake profile of a woman they busted to try to bait and lure her friends and family, without their knowledge. Hm, isn’t that “entrapment”? Isn’t entrapment illegal? Facebook, a lot of good your so called “real name” policy did in that circumstance. That was a real name alright, but still a FAKE, despite “proper id” which law enforcement officers, government officials, and even common crooks, can easily gain access to. Can you say, “backfire“?

DEA Impersonated Woman, Set Up Fake Facebook Page, Posted Photos From Her Seized Phone To Make It Look Real Chris Hamby, over at Buzzfeed, has an incredible and crazy story about the DEA impersonating a woman, creating a fake facebook profile without her knowledge or permission, and posting photos from her seized cell phone, all in order to try to get information from others. The specifics involve a woman, Sondra “Sosa” Arquiett, who was apparently the girlfriend of Jermaine Branford, a guy who was accused of (and eventually pleaded guilty to) drug trafficking. Arquiett was a minor player, charged with basically allowing Branford to use her apartment for storing and processing the cocaine he was trafficking. Arquiett was eventually sentenced to probation. Where this gets interesting, however, is that Arquiett has now filed a civil suit against the US and DEA agent Timothy Sinnigen, who allegedly set up the fake facebook account. Source: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20141006/17572528748/dea-impersonated-woman-set-up-fake-facebook-page-posted-photos-her-seized-phone-to-make-it-look-real.shtml

As if those situations aren’t revealing enough, facebook recently disclosed its purchase of an Aerospace company, U.K.-based Ascenta for its globe-spanning Internet plans and use of solar powered DRONES. Drones? For the purpose of providing internet to remote parts of the globe at “low cost”? What if natives in remote regions have no way to prove their “real name”, facebook? Clearly, “fakebook” has its priorities straight. Why not just put that effort into something people in remote regions can really use, such as FOOD, SHELTER, and CLEAN WATER. Or, advocate for sustainable agriculture and clean skies? Or anything that benefits humanity? The future sustainability of the planet? Nourish underprivileged children? Technology to create a cleaner environment? ANYTHING other than another way to make more useless dollars, contributing to the demise of global society.

A Socially Irresponsible Social Network | Business Line

Take a look around at what our world is becoming and the rise in conditions such as autism, alzheimers, cancers, autoimmune disorders and various other ailments that can be directly attributed to the toxicity in our food system, water, medicine, vaccines, and AIR and for what? Corporate profit? It’s sad to see such destruction being perpetuated by those that have no idea what they’re really doing due to the fact that they themselves are adversely affected by vaccines, GMOs, herbicides, pesticides, and other toxins abundant in our atmosphere by corporations that put profit above our health and sustainability of the planet. We are conditioned from birth to accept the system. It makes me wonder if humanity is a thing of the past or a never-was? Our “technology” has far surpassed our wisdom and will surely be the demise of our species.

Facebook thumbs DOWN

The following are only a few “fakebook” users on the growing list of known TROLL profiles/pages that facebook allows to run free, cyberstalk and harass activists, violating its own community standards and highly irresponsible “real name” policy, many of whom are still there despite multiple reports:

Rusty Tanner (to harass activist Russ Tanner), facebook id#  1529571003924184

Fuck Alex Jones, facebook id# 522936674406041 (THIS ONE REMAINED UP FOR YEARS DESPITE NUMEROUS REPORTS OF THE NAME ALONE IN OBVIOUS VIOLATION OF FACEBOOK’S SO CALLED “COMMUNITY STANDARDS”)

Khan Trayles, (pronounced “contrails”) facebook id# 100008370794331

We Love GMOS and Vaccines, facebook id#1380693538867364

Captain Carl the Chemtrail Pilot, facebook id# 244247085785036 (this offending shill page remains up harassing people)

Jay Uzinato, facebook id# 1662205672

Reschekle Berglesteinowitz, facebook id# 100008246919631

Yuri Zephyros, facebook id# 100004839065506

Portia Plantago-Lanceolata, facebook id# 100006534365399

Randall Flagg (copyright violating troll), facebook id# 100008244554284

Danni Bannanni, facebook id# 1449245650

Eman Sugob, (“Name Bogus” spelled backwards) facebook id# 100007374608251

Bob Solo, facebook id#100003622144034

10/16/15 UPDATE – finally removed after months of contact with facebook’s legal department legal@fb.com – FAKE “Rebel Siren – Public Figure” facebook id#1530415123861880 (to harass real author/activist Rebel Siren)

Update, finally got removed after SEVERAL MONTHS of emailing facebook’s legal department – FAKE “Rebel Siren – Exposing Corruption and Crimes Against Humanity” facebook id#559789960831840 (shill page created to harass author/activist Rebel Siren by “mirroring” the REAL page)

Peter WiganPete Greenall, facebook id# 100008201523866

Madisondrugs Loon, (to harass activist Madisonstar Moon) facebook id# 256567904530799 (this fake page was literally up for YEARS before finally being removed)

Plus HUNDREDS MORE fake shill pages and profiles remain up harassing people.

Trolls on Russ Tanner page
CLICK TO VIEW

Madisonstar Moon’s profile & page routinely gets attacked and banned, as well as specific content often gets removed for “violating facebook’s community standards” for no valid reason. It’s completely senseless to allow the cyberstalking disinformation trolls to run rampant and allow their hateful, antagonistic pages, posts, and comments, while removing activist’s profiles, pages that are clearly not “violations”. See video below for yet another example of “fakebook’s” blatant discrimination siding with cyberstalkers. Activists are being targeted, attacked, harassed, and bullied by trolls with obvious fake pages such as, “Madisondrugs Loon” (for example, above it is accusing well known activist, Russ Tanner of being what it is; a criminal against humanity).

This is the kind of thing we’re up against as activists every day that we dare to speak up and share information, to be victimized by rampant shill-idiocy plaguing our social media forums, running wild on “fakebook“, with facebook’s consent.

Madisondrugs Loon” had been reported over and over by every activist that knew about it, yet continued to run freely harassing activists & cyberstalking the real Madisonstar Moon, before finally disappearing. Below, “Paid Shill“, speaks for itself and was on facebook also for YEARS before finally being removed, while activist’s profiles & pages continue to be violated and placed on suspension for a variety of bogus reasons.  If you come up against troll profiles using fake names such as the one below, report them for using fake names and see how long it takes facebook to take appropriate action, if ever.

This is the kind of thing we're up against as activists, rampant shill-idiocy and no help from
Click photo above for Huffpost Tech article by Sam Fiorella, “Exposing Cyber Shills and Social Media’s Underworld“.

Disconnecting people from family, friends, and fellow activists, deleting all of the work we’ve done to raise awareness & share information on your forum, leaving our pages unattended without a profile to admin it, vulnerable to more troll attacks, only proves the point and makes activists stronger. But, you know what it makes you, facebook? Part of the problem.

Facebook faces criticism over its privacy policy – CNET

Facebook faces criticism amid claims it breached ethical guidelines

Facebook responds to criticism of its experiment on users

Criticism of Facebook – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

BBC News – Facebook emotion experiment sparks criticism

Facebook facing suit over private messages – Jan. 3, 2014

Facebook Lawsuit – Huffington Post

17,000 join Facebook class action lawsuit – Orlando

Student launches Facebook lawsuit over privacy concerns

Facebook Obtained Nearly $2 Billion From Legal Judgments Against Spammers

Advertisements
The Heartland Institute of Chicago EXPOSED by Yale University

The Heartland Institute of Chicago EXPOSED by Yale University

 

Yale Climate Connections

The Heartland Institute of Chicago EXPOSED (along with others).

“Strange Bedfellows? Climate Change Denial and Support for Geoengineering”

By David Appell

Original Article Published October 30, 2013

Yale Climate Science
click here for original article

Potential benefits of geoengineering, despite attendant risks, appeal to some interests showing little concern for the seriousness of the climate change issue generally. What goes here?

These days, an article headlined “Geo-Engineering Seen as a Practical, Cost-Effective Global Warming Strategy” would hardly be surprising.

But what is surprising is that the headline came from a group denying global warming exists: The Heartland Institute in Chicago.

Well-known for its aggressive contrarian position on manmade global warming, and widely lambasted for its “I still believe in Global Warming. Do you?” billboard featuring a picture of Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber, the Heartland Institute might seem unlikely to propose a solution to a problem it doubts exists. So why did the group run an article on geoengineering in the December 2007 issue of its newsletter Environment & Climate News?

Written by David Schnare, at the time an EPA staff scientist and now a director at the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy, in the Virginia suburbs of Washington, D.C., the article is based on testimony Schnare gave to the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works earlier that same year. Schnare mentions the ease, speed, and relative low cost of geoengineering schemes like injecting sunlight-reflecting aerosols into the stratosphere, called solar radiation management (SRM). In particular, Schnare in that article cited research by scientist Ken Caldeira* of Stanford University (and now also the Carnegie Institute) and concludes “reducing greenhouse gases will cost around 2 percent of the gross domestic product, while geo-engineering (by putting reflective aerosols into the upper atmosphere) will cost about one-thousandth of that.” Nobel Laureate Paul Crutzen’s 2006 article helped pave way for more serious consideration of geoengineering options.

But Schnare’s article, written just a year after Nobel Laureate Paul Crutzen’s seminal and controversial 2006 article calling for serious active research into solar radiation management, ignores the many complications, side effects, and unintended consequences of SRM that worry many. Crutzen had specifically mentioned undesirable destruction of protective stratospheric ozone. And SRM does nothing to stop ocean acidification, instead creating a world never before seen, high in carbon dioxide while relatively low in temperature.

Only in the last sentence of his article did Schnare casually advocate a vigorous development away from carbon-based energy sources, writing “the most sensible approach would be a mixed strategy of geo-engineering…and vigorously developing a transition from carbon-based energy, to include research on scrubbing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.”

Despite this article and others, and at least one presentation at its annual conferences, “Heartland doesn’t have a position on geoengineering,” according to Joseph Bast, the Institute’s president and CEO.

‘The Lomborg Maneuver’

The Heartland Institute is hardly alone in considering geoengineering as a solution to a problem it basically doesn’t see as a problem in the first place. Bjorn Lomborg and ‘Lomborg Maneuver’ — opposition to ‘real-world’ actions, but support for more radical approaches?

In recent years, Bjorn Lomborg has often downplayed the threats from climate change while pushing geoengineering as a short-term solution. So too have Newt Gingrich, the former EPA staff economist Alan Carlin, and the American Enterprise Institute, which earlier this year posted a seminar calling solar radiation management “an evolving climate policy option” on its website…a site chock-full of climate contrarianism.

One environmental group has taken to calling this straddle the “Lomborg maneuver” — “switching from opposing real-world action on climate change to supporting the most extreme possible action on climate change.”

How might one reconcile such seemingly contradictory positions? and why do they often come from politically conservative individuals and organizations? In his recent book, Earthmasters: The Dawn of the Age of Climate Engineering, Clive Hamilton argues that this pair of positions maintains the dominant power structures of society, especially the roles of the energy mega-corporations that have a great deal to lose from any shift away from fossil fuels.

Hamilton, a professor of public ethics at Charles Sturt University in Canberra, Australia, writes “…these results are consistent with the more general argument that conservatives tend to take a more hierarchical view of society, as a natural order in which some groups are dominant and some subservient. Like a patient who will accept the doctor’s diagnosis only if the illness is treatable, a solution to global warming that does not destabilize a person’s worldview — but in fact validates it — makes recognizing the problem palatable. As the identity of conservative white males tends to be more strongly bound to the prevailing social structure, geoengineering is the kind of solution to climate change that is less threatening to their values and sense of self they are consistent with the ideas of control over the environment and the personal liberties associated with free market capitalism. Just as the need to defend a cultural worldview makes conservative white males prone to repudiate climate science, so that worldview will make them prone to support geoengineering solutions”.–

Hamilton cites research by Dan Kahan of the Yale Law School and others showing that facts must accommodate one’s cultural values if they are to be accepted. Kahan calls this the cultural cognition thesis — that cognitively, cultural values come before facts in assessing many public risk conflicts, and to be accepted, facts must accommodate those values. Kahan concludes “as a result of a complex of interrelated psychological mechanisms, groups of individuals will credit and dismiss evidence of risk in patterns that reflect and reinforce their distinctive understandings of how society should be organized.” Australian professor Clive Hamilton sees geoengineering as less threatening to conservatives’ ‘values and sense of self.’

This thesis helps explain many of the current sharp divisions over public policies, especially those with scientific origins such as climate change, vaccinations, and genetically modified foods. Those with values that place more emphasis on the individual would be expected to dismiss environmental and technological risks if solving them requires restricting industry and commerce. Those who more highly value egalitarianism and community are generally suspicious of capitalism’s disparities and its emphasis on individual initiative, and they therefore are more likely to advocate top-down regulation of commercial activity.

In the context of climate change and geoengineering, Kahan and his colleagues found that making their study participants aware of geoengineering’s potential to address climate change, while making them aware also of restrictions of carbon dioxide emissions, helped to overcome the cultural polarizations that dog the climate change issue. The researchers found too that their study subjects exposed to geoengineering ideas — in particular those who more highly value individualism were slightly more concerned about the risks of climate change than those who were not exposed.

All people are prone to the cultural cognition thesis, especially those at the more extreme ends of the spectrum. But not all realize that the thesis goes both ways. For instance, the conservative writer Jonah Goldberg — who often downplays the risks from climate change (he recently wrote in the Los Angeles Times, “OK, things have gotten a wee bit warmer outside”) while advocating a geoengineering approach — accused “global warming alarmists” of advancing solutions that appeal to their core cultural values. In an interview last year with RightWing News.com, Goldberg said, “One of the reasons why conservatives are right to be suspicious of global warming is that it confirms the exact same suite of policy approaches that these people were arguing for when they were worried about a population bomb. You know, managed scarcity, throw a wet blanket on capitalism, manage the economy.” But Goldberg did not acknowledge that his own beliefs and ideology might influence his attitude and approach to the climate problem no less than those he was criticizing.

Not Without Risks

The reality is that geoengineering itself carries risks, raises difficult ethical considerations, and poses the possibility of unintended consequences, so it is not the slam-dunk first choice solution to problems posed by a warming planet.

Ironically, some of those who say climate is too complex to be forecast, or who criticize models used in climate science as being incomplete or inaccurate, seem to have no trouble advocating geoengineering quick fixes which themselves carry climate and environmental complexities, or which would require extensive modeling to understand implementation and implications.

All geoengineering schemes have unwanted side effects, and some can be significant. Solar radiation management by aerosol injection into the upper atmosphere, for instance, mimics large volcanic explosions, like the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption that caused about one degree Celsius of global surface cooling for a year or two (returning to normal over the succeeding three years).

But that eruption also caused a 10 percent drop in worldwide precipitation, because it reduced evapotranspiration rates over land, and that situation didn’t return to normal for about three years.

There are concerns too that solar radiation management would reduce the essential Asian monsoon or cause drought in Africa. A recent modeling experiment by Simone Tilmes, of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, and colleagues found regional rainfall reductions of up to 7 percent when geoengineering reduced incoming solar energy so that climate forcings were at a pre-industrial level even as atmospheric carbon dioxide levels quadrupled.

There is another large cost to geoengineering by solar radiation management: once undertaken to reduce temperatures, it must be kept up essentially forever or warming will resume in a very rapid and dangerous fashion (see figure on original post). Andrew Ross and H. Damon Matthews, in a study published in Environmental Research Letters, found that temperature would rise by up to 0.76°C in the first year after termination of a 40-year (2020 to 2059) SRM project, with up to another degree in the next two decades.

Climate engineering and the risk of rapid climate change. Andrew Ross and H Damon Matthews. 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 045103. Permission: IOP Publishing Ltd, under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA license.

Such abrupt climate change can shock ecosystems, especially affecting marine biodiversity by giving advantage to mobile or opportunistic species. It would be even more abrupt and dangerous if atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were to rise ever higher. Such threats would hang heavy over future generations, obligated to pay billions of dollars every year to continue to manage solar radiation for an increasingly out-of-kilter planet they did not create, having to carry the burdens of rapid and abrupt climate change were war, revolution, or economic distress to force a halt to the risk management effort.

And these are hardly the only reasons that geoengineering, though tempting, may not be the best solution to climate change, as scientist Alan Robock of Rutgers University wrote in his “20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea.”

‘Laudably Honest’

Of course, not everyone sees a problem with favoring a certain solution because it aligns with their cultural values. “I think it’s laudably honest,” says Eli Lehrer, president and co-founder of the R Street Institute, a Washington-based thinktank that, in its words, “supports free markets; limited, effective government; and responsible environmental stewardship.”

“Many want to use climate change to talk about a pre-existing agenda,” says Lehrer, who accepts the scientific evidence of manmade climate change and favors a carbon tax. “They may well be right. I’d like to do it too.”

Lehrer sees geoengineering as a common sense approach deserving of research, but to be undertaken only if the problem proves severe enough. “It’s probably the best solution to an extreme situation,” he says, adding that a goal of zero carbon emissions is not achievable or “worthwhile.” He disagrees with actually doing geoengineering any time soon, calling the potential adverse impacts “extreme and potentially dangerous.”

Humans vs. Nature

Since Crutzen’s 2006 paper, geoengineering is no longer a taboo subject, feared even for polite discussion, because it can offer an alternative way out of a nagging carbon problem — bariatric surgery instead of strict dieting.

Many scientists now are seriously exploring solar radiation management and ways to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, philosophers are weighing the moral and ethical dimensions of geoengineering, and even a few environmental groups have opened their minds to concepts once considered anathema. The newly released IPCC Working Group I Fifth Assessment Report mentioned geoengineering for the first time ever.

Geoengineering solutions retain the idea of human’s technical mastery over nature. Instead of human societies changing to accommodate the natural world they rely on, climate engineering — consciously or not — is the view that nature can be fundamentally bent and manipulated to accommodate humanity. Wresting with nature is, in a very real way, the story of human development, and taming the wild world has brought some (but by no means all) wealth, relative comfort and ease, and freedom from basic wants. At the same time, that insistence on control now poses risks to the planet as the most fundamental stage on which that existence plays out.

“There is something increasingly desperate about placing more faith in technological cleverness when it is the unrelenting desire to command the natural world that has brought us to their point,” Hamilton writes in the last chapter of his book. “Unless we understand why a certain kind of rationality seems to have failed, appeals to more reason are quixotic. After all, the separation of natural and human history and the dominance of a certain form of calculative rationality were each products of the same Enlightenment process.” — end

SOURCE:  http://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2013/10/strange-bedfellows-climate-change-denial-and-support-for-geoengineering/

We can only speculate that The Heartland Institute of Chicago’s duplicitous actions are the direct result of funding by the fossil fuel industry, (big oil, coal, et al). They no longer disclose their funders to the public: “Regrettably, listing our donors in this way allowed people who disagree with our views to accuse us of being “paid” by specific donors to take positions in public policy debates, something we never do. After much deliberation and with some regret, we now keep confidential the identities of all our donors. This is standard practice by nonprofit advocacy organizations regardless of their philosophies.” http://heartland.org/funding

However, according to other sources, there is a definite monetary connection to big oil, coal, tobacco, and the pharmaceutical industry, (among others):

“The Heartland Institute does not disclose its funding sources. According to its brochures, Heartland receives money from approximately 1,600 individuals and organizations, and no single corporate entity donates more than 5% of the operating budget, although the figure for individual donors can be much higher, with a single anonymous donor providing $4.6 million in 2008, and $979,000 in 2011, accounting for 20% of Heartland’s overall budget, according to reports of a leaked fundraising plan. Heartland states that it does not accept government funds and does not conduct contract research for special-interest groups.

MediaTransparency reported that Heartland received funding from politically conservative foundations such as the Castle Rock Foundation, the Sarah Scaife Foundation, the John M. Olin Foundation, and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation.] In 2011, the Institute received $25,000 from the Charles G. Koch Foundation. The Charles Koch Foundation states that the contribution was “$25,000 to the Heartland Institute in 2011 for research in healthcare, not climate change, and this was the first and only donation the Foundation made to the institute in more than a decade”.

Oil and gas companies have contributed to the Heartland Institute, including over $600,000 from ExxonMobil between 1998 and 2005. Greenpeace reported that Heartland received almost $800,000 from ExxonMobil. In 2008, ExxonMobil said that they would stop funding to groups skeptical of climate warming, including Heartland. Joseph Bast, president of the Heartland Institute, argued that ExxonMobil was simply distancing itself from Heartland out of concern for its public image.

The Heartland Institute has also received funding and support from tobacco companies Philip Morris, Altria and Reynolds American, and pharmaceutical industry firms GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer and Eli Lilly. State Farm Insurance, USAA and Diageo are former supporters. The Independent reported that Heartland’s receipt of donations from Exxon and Philip Morris indicates a “direct link between anti-global warming skeptics funded by the oil industry and the opponents of the scientific evidence showing that passive smoking can damage people’s health”.

As of 2006, the Walton Family Foundation (run by the family of the founder of Wal-Mart) had contributed approximately $300,000 to Heartland. The Heartland Institute published an op-ed in the Louisville Courier-Journal defending Wal-Mart against criticism over its treatment of workers. The Walton Family Foundation donations were not disclosed in the op-ed, and the editor of the Courier-Journal stated that he was unaware of the connection and would probably not have published the op-ed had he known of it. The St. Petersburg Times described the Heartland Institute as “particularly energetic defending Wal-Mart.” Heartland has stated that its authors were not “paid to defend Wal-Mart” and did not receive funding from the corporation; it did not disclose the $300,000+ received from the Walton Family Foundation.

In 2012, following the February 2012 document leak and a controversial advertising campaign, the institute lost substantial funding as corporate donors sought to dissociate themselves from the institute. According to the advocacy group Forecast the Facts, Heartland lost more than $825,000, or one third of planned corporate fundraising for the year. The shortfall led to the Illinois COAL lobby sponsoring the institute’s May 2012 climate conference – the “first publicly acknowledged donations from the coal industry.” — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heartland_Institute

There is prevalent double-dipping in the crude world. For example: “BP – Deceiving The Public About Geoengineering”: https://rebelsiren.wordpress.com/2014/06/15/bp-deceiving-the-public-about-geoengineering/

ICCC3 June 2009 VIDEO: “The conference’s key message, global warming is not a crisis was delivered directly to the nation’s capitol and elected officials”.

ICCC4 July 2013 VIDEO: “Reconsidering the science and economics”.

If The Heartland Institute and BIG OIL have their way, the planet will be rendered an uninhabitable wasteland, and all life, including the human species, will be EXTINCT. Shouldn’t we take better care of our home? HOME, the documentary: http://youtu.be/jqxENMKaeCU

More about The Heartland Institute: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/heartland-institute/

The Heartland Institute of ChicagoPERPETUATING PROPAGANDA FOR MONETARY GAIN
One South Wacker Drive #2740, Chicago, IL 60606

PHONE (312) 377-4000, EMAIL think@heartland.org

PROPAGANDA formal definition:
prop•a•gan•da, präpəˈgandə/noun
1. derogatory information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view; “he was charged with distributing enemy propaganda”. Synonyms: information, promotion, advertising, spin, publicity; disinformation, counter-information; historical agitprop; informal info, hype, plugging; puff piece; the big lie “the prophetic novel is about a government that controls the masses by spreading propaganda”; the dissemination of propaganda as a political strategy: “the party’s leaders believed that a long period of education and propaganda would be necessary”.

 

Francis Mangels – Retired USDA Biologist with the US Forest Service – Scientific Findings, Lab Reports Conclusive Evidence of Climate Engineering

Francis Mangels – Retired USDA Biologist with the US Forest Service – Scientific Findings, Lab Reports Conclusive Evidence of Climate Engineering

Mr. Francis Mangels’, retired USDA Biologist with the US Forest Service (35 years), scientific findings:

GEOENGINEERING  — What We Know as of 7/7/14, +70 lab reports, photo/objective evidence, logic, facts, research, and scientist observations:

LAB/FIELD REPORTS — Normal rain is zero ug/l metallic elements, pH about 5.6.

o A lined pond (guzzler) near Redding has about 375,000 ug/l of aluminum. We are concerned that deer and wildlife drink this water. USFS ignored letters.

o Sugar Pine Canyon Creek, Redding, CA has 4,600,000 ppb of aluminum (normal soil 15,000 ppb) in upper and lower stream. Fish losing scales, ulcerous, sick.

o Sisson meadow pond sludge water in Mt Shasta has 12,000 mg/kg of aluminum, and pond is fed by city spring water, but exposed to sky (sample taken at outlet).

o Mt. Shasta City Park spring water had 1540 ug/l of aluminum in 2009. Other streams have more. Aquatic and terra insects about 20% of numbers since 2007.

o Since terrestrial insects are now very low, song bird populations are also very low. Road and window kill birds or wildlife are very lean, diseased, or cancerous.

o Fish and insects died in Cold Creek, Mt Shasta. Aluminum, lead, arsenic. Of 200 trout stomachs examined in 2014, none had an aquatic insect, 95% had nothing.

o Strontium, barium, and aluminum are often found in soil. “Dust” does not explain high amounts in the rain or snow, nor zero, nor concentration above soil numbers.

o Outside soils in Mt. Shasta area in 2007 have over 1.6 % or 16,000 mg/kg of aluminum. Soil is 13000 mg/kg (1.3%) aluminum under my house, likely natural.

o Snowdrift near McCloud on Mt Shasta at 8000’ has 61,100 ug/l aluminum, 83 of barium, and 383 of strontium, over 4 times that of protected soil.

o 2013 rain report in Mt. Shasta gauge is 13,100 ug/l aluminum, 130 barium, 138 strontium. Undrinkable by state standards, 13 times the allowable limit.

o Lab reports of storms range from 0 to 30 ug/l in rain with no spraying to 13,100 ug/l of aluminum; always positively correlated to jet spraying (national info).

o Mt. Shasta samples were taken by a USDA scientist with legal water sampling experience and MS degree; he uses a plastic USNWS rain gauge on a 7’ pole.

o Samples show a direct relationship to contrail density: More contrails, higher Aluminum, Barium, and/or Strontium in water; also boron, titanate, and arsenic.

o Zero readings of any elements prove our samples are not self-contaminated.

o The Mt. Shasta city water report indicates that aluminum, barium, strontium, lead, mercury, cadmium, arsenic, boron, and chromium are not found in city water yet.

o Other states show high Al, Ba, Sr, As, B, Pb, Fe, and Mn, but any may be zero.

o Iron/manganese may be meteor dust. Lead is from planes or old leaded gasoline.

o Some have higher Al, Sr, or Ba, or zero on any, so formulas may change.

o Radioactivity in rain was tested with a Geiger counter, no abnormal indications.

o Some readings may be the result of local polluting industries. However, results are nationally correlated to jet spraying, over 90% with no local factory source.

o Fibers that appear instead of dust have Welsbach elements; they are a spray error.

o Geoengineering activist sites posting scientists’ data after the UV report was then crashed 8 times by hackers (military/corporate). Activist sites have over 12 million hits. Debunkers only 175.

o Ultraviolet B is up 1200% of normal. UVA also up. UVB causes skin cancer and sunburn, and cell death on plants. Nanoparticles destroy ozone.

o Mutagenic effects on corn, ovaried tassels, tomatoes. Tree top and bark damage evident, notably betulaceae, tulipifera, deodars, maples. Grapes, legumes immune.

SAMPLING PH – From USDA 1983 Soil Survey Siskiyou Co. and rain reports.

 When contrails are inactive, rain is under 6 pH. With activity, pH is 6.5 to 7.5.

 The pH of rain is directly and nationally related to contrail pre-storm weather front spraying. Over 600 tests have been made, and this pattern continues.

 Coniferous Douglas fir forest north of Redding, CA was tested by USDA Soils specialists Komar and Jim Collins at 7.4 pH. He said it should be 5.5 for the soil.

 Normal acidity for Mt. Shasta area Deetz 125, 126 soils, a habitat of acidic black oak and mixed conifer forest, is 4.5-6.0. Now it is 6.5-7.5 pH in over 400 samples.

 About ten samples were taken by meter in McCloud, CA of yards, oak forest, and gardens. They ranged from 7.0 to 8.5, or un-naturally alkaline. pH papers agreed.

 The St. Francis organic garden and lawn in Mt. Shasta was 5.5 pH in 2003, now 6.5 to 7.0. Soil is 10-20xs more alkaline. The pH papers, meters, kits all agreed.

 Garden compost is black oak leaves, acorns, and ponderosa pine needles (acid), maybe mixed in grass. Sulfur slightly lowered pH.

 A pH increase is likely oxides, hydroxides, and carbonates of Welsbach elements.

 Contrails boomed during George Bush years 2000-2008, especially after 2006 and pH increased remarkably in soil and rain in those anti-environment years.

 Garden production declined for acid-soil-loving vegetables; potatoes, tomatoes. Most root crops declined in Deetz soils, but unpredictable in neutral Diyou soils.

 Some metallic cations are toxic to biological systems, and could explain 90% loss of aquatic insect populations in 4 headwater streams. Less change below springs.

 Natural insect variations occur, but not an 80% loss, particularly of diptera that live in sediment deposits in streams, where toxic metals accumulate.

 The metals, etc. are not from China, and scientists on Mt. Rainier verified it.

 The three main cations (as nanoparticles?) cause endocrine/enzyme malfunction. They are the basis for, or act similar to, prion diseases such as “mad cow.”

Sufficient evidence indicates correlation with neurological, lung, and bone diseases, particularly in children as autism, asthma, and in adults as Alzheimer’s.

Breathing and neural problems increased after spraying, esp. elderly and children. Autism 1/15,000 to 1/50, Alzheimer’s is now 1 of 3 a plague in 2013 says CDC.

 Five pet dogs refuse to drink rain/snow water, but insist on tap water. Witness!

 Similarly, neural, skin, lung, cancer, or endocrine problems are now frequently reported in cats (meticulous groomers), dogs, and horses (drink pond water).

MILITARY CONTRAIL OBSERVATIONS – Observations, telescopes, retired military.

 In telescopes, contrail jets have few side windows, and usually military kc135 or kc434s. Some contract Boeing 737s have belly/wingtip nozzles. Video/pics available.

 Some contrails are multi-colored; often the middle streak shiny blue, brown, dark gray, but outside two are white. 2 or 4 engine jets, often with 3-6 trails, some offset.

 San Francisco Flight Aware says over 30 jets per day over Mt. Shasta are normal, about 100 West Coast. Odd patterns happen, at any altitude, but should be unusual.

 Heavy spraying days are often just before weather fronts, and mostly military jets. A weather lady on TV-12 remarked on this 11/24/10 and was fired.

 Contrail jets are most active dawn to dusk. Commercial jets do not usually leave persistent contrails, but military jets almost always do. Some jets contrail at night.

 Cloud formations and combinations are changed, new, and unusual since 2003.

 Before 2000, skies were typically a deep blue. Now skies are typically whitish haze or gray-brown blue, and true blue is unusual due to high elevation jet pollutants.

 In the 1950s to 1980s, a normal contrail was maybe 30 jets long and disappeared. Now they last several hours to all day, especially since 2003, or George Bush years.

 Some jets emit a ball of smoke over 5 degrees in diameter, and the contrail begins. If it were a lens of cold air, it would not be a ball, but fade in or out. Impossible display.

 Some contrails appear to have particulate matter streaming down out of them, much like fireworks displays, leaving trails of smoke as the particles descend. Smoke balls.

 Some contrails converge to a point, often over Mt. Shasta, then re-align, cross, curve, grid format, or radiate (asterisk-like) out from the mountain. Atypical flight variants.

 Two-engine and four-engine jets leaving 3 or 5 line contrails, with nozzles seen in mid-belly or wings. Military jets leave persistent contrails, usually in odd numbers.

 Pro-military congressmen and USFS claim contrails are harmless. Results of certified mail/phone: no answer, ignorance, security reasons.

 Many locals and USFS indicate lightning is more violent after jet spraying, esp. width and number of bolts. The number of thunderstorms is below normal and erratic.

 Heat of condensation in physics indicates micron-sized particles reduce rainfall. California is in a drought since spraying began, as rain transfers to Eastern USA.

 Contrail composition measured in rainfall is the same as indicated in the San Diego conference Feb 20 and in Welsbach geo-engineering patents used by military jets.

 Geo-engineers at the Feb. 20, 2010 meeting in San Diego saw D. Keith admit on camera that spraying may have terrible consequences. They don’t know.

 The military says that “engine erosion” causes metals in contrails, but won’t say more (military secret). Do engines wear out to require an extra 20 million tons Al per year?

 Solar collection panel efficiency remarkably decreases with contrail spraying, robbing investors of their just share of solar electric power up to 50%. Industrial jeopardy.

 At “What in the World Are They Spraying” viewing in Redding, CA 12/10 a full panel of medical, ex-military, solar experts, and scientists affirmed it before over 500 people.

 Weathermen report consistent upper atmosphere conditions, but one day has 50 trails and the next day none, can one believe all jets cancelled? Where is consistency?

 Once a year, we watch two jets fly at a giant thunderhead, melt a 1-mile blue hole in it, fly through it, and the storm falls apart. What a drought-causing weapon!

 Many photos are available of straight lines, X’s, grids, circles, squares combos in high clouds, and in nature this is impossible; a military weather weapon system.

 Only the military industrial complex has funding capability; a black hole budget ($1.3 trillion) and control to be able to do geoengineering at $5 billion per year.

 Mud rain in Chico, CA on 5/14/12 had 58,000 ug/l Al, 480 Sr, and 413 Ba. “Never seen it before. Hard to get off,” the newspaper said, “Dust in rainy weather.” Oh?

 We observed a military jet 1/2 mile away spraying Shasta via nozzles, returning over precisely the same route ½ hour later, not spraying (no time to land), routine pattern.

 Why would all these scientists be making this stuff up about climate and geoengineering effects? A fact is a fact is a fact, not a belief or opinion.

This is revised as new reliable observations and data are available. By Francis Mangels.

Thank you again, Mr. Mangels, for the outstanding scientific work you have shared with the Rebel Siren BLOG, and for your bravery in facing the disinformation trolls that targeted and attacked you. I am honored to publish your report and look forward to more from you in the future.

GEOENGINEERING REFERENCES:

Council on Foreign Relations- Unilateral Geoengineering Briefing Notes 2008

Novim – Climate Engineering 2009

NOAA – Bibliometric Analysis of Climate Engineering Research – 2013

National Academy Press – Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth (2015)

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) Journal Content for Solar Radiation Management

Bill Gates Funding Geoengineering Research since 2007

Climate Engineering Conference 2012

Has The anti-Geoengineering Movement Been Hijacked? – Michael J. Murphy

Former USDA Crop Loss Adjuster Rosalind Peterson Keynote Speaker At 60th Annual UN Climate Conference 2007 To Address Weather Modification, Geoengineering, and Jet Fuel Pollution

Documented Government Experiments on US Citizens

With this kind of information revealed, excluding the paid shills, how can anyone still deny that weather modification and climate engineering is a reality?…

Unethical Experimentation In the US (Wikipedia is not my first choice for information, however, they have compiled a legitimate and verifiable list of unethical human experiments – always do your own research and share information widely): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

Unethical human experimentation and industrial polluting of our land, water, and air, have been a reality for decades upon decades.

US Radium clean up is taking decades: Uranium Contamination In Navajo Nation “Five Year Plan AND – the EPA’s “five year plan” turned into a 40 year plan: Clean Up Of Toxic Uranium Legacy Taking Decades by Green Fire Times

Dynamic Aviation (aerial spraying, one of many aviation companies that perform aerial spraying services and with the following list of customers, it’s unlikely that they spray only pesticide). Its Customers:

Dynamic Aviation Customers (where the above information was obtained, click this link to verify): http://www.dynamicaviation.com/our-customers/

Dynamic Aviation AERIAL APPLICATION (Again, Dynamic Aviation is only one of many aerial companies contracted to perform aerial chemical spraying): http://www.dynamicaviation.com/flight-solutions-and-services/aerial-application/

NCAR/UCAR EOL “Development, Deployment, Data, Discovery – Research Aviation Facility has been in operation since 1967, serving the NSF geosciences community by providing research platforms and expertise in airborne installations and measurement techniques”https://www.eol.ucar.edu/about/our-organization/raf 

NCAR/UCAR EOL – PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICEQuote: “Are you thinking about a field study in a remote part of the world that requires international agreements and clearances?  Are you a researcher who has a great scientific idea but little experience in planning and implementing a multi-agency, multi-facility and multi-scientist campaign? Are you overwhelmed by the prospect of having to make logistics arrangements for a “measurement super site” in a location where little to no infrastructure exists?“. For more info on EOL “field projects”: https://www.eol.ucar.edu/field-projects

Geoengineering field experimentation ramped up in 2009: http://www.novim.org/projects/climate-engineering/.

Feasibility of Space-Based Monitoring for Governance of Solar Radiation Management, Summer 2011: http://www.aerospace.org/2013/07/31/feasibility-of-space-based-monitoring-for-governance-of-solar-radiation-management/

Koch Bros (big oil profiteers/climate skeptic funders) Weather Derivatives: http://www.bizjournals.com/houston/stories/1999/11/22/story7.html

Geoengineering and the Science Communication: A Cross Cultural Experiment (Yale Law) 2012: http://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1284&context=faculty_publications

Woodrow Wilson International Center For Scholars – Science & Technology Innovation Program Nov 2011: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Geoengineering_for_Decision_Makers_0.pdf

Royal Society of Chemistry – Energy & Environmental Science, March 2011: http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2011/EE/c1ee01256h#!divAbstract

History and Problems in Weather Modification Ronald B. Standler Scientific Attorney, 2002: http://www.rbs2.com/w2.htm

Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative – Partnership of the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), the Royal Society, and TWAS, the world academy of sciences: http://www.srmgi.org/

HARVARD – Stratospheric Aerosol Injection for Geoengineering Purposeshttp://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AGUFM.U41E..05T

Edgewood/Aberdeen Army Experiments on Military Personnel:

From 1955 to 1975, the U.S. Army Chemical Corps conducted classified medical studies at Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland. The purpose was to evaluate the impact of low-dose chemical warfare agents on military personnel and to test protective clothing and pharmaceuticals.” — (see link below for more)

http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/edgewood-aberdeen/index.asp

The moment 18-year-old Army Pvt. Tim Josephs arrived at Edgewood Arsenal in 1968, he knew there was something different about the place.
..
“It just did not look like a military base, more like a hospital,” recalled Josephs, a Pittsburgh native. Josephs had volunteered for a two-month assignment at Edgewood, in Maryland, lured by three-day weekends closer to home.
..
“It was like a plum assignment,” Josephs said. “The idea was they would test new Army field jackets, clothing, weapons and things of that nature, but no mention of drugs or chemicals.”
..
But when he went to fill out paperwork the morning after his arrival, the base personnel were wearing white lab coats, and Josephs said he had second thoughts. An officer took him aside.
..
“He said, ‘You volunteered for this. You’re going to do it. If you don’t, you’re going to jail. You’re going to Vietnam either way — before or after,'” Josephs said recently.
..
From 1955 to 1975, military researchers at Edgewood were using not only animals but human subjects to test a witches’ brew of drugs and chemicals. They ranged from potentially lethal nerve gases like VX and sarin to incapacitating agents like BZ. – CNN (Source link below).

.

Information should be shared, not hoarded or “sold”, therefore, everything published on Rebel Siren is sharable, no cost, and accessible to everyone in the world. ~Peace

Trolls Gone Wild – A Mini-Doc by Madison Star Moon

In the continuing series of articles exposing trolls/shills/cyberbullies, introducing activist Madison Star Moon’s mini-doc appropriately titled, “Trolls Gone Wild”. Well done, Madison Star Moon!

If WE (all people of the world) care about the future sustainability of this planet and all life on it, then we absolutely MUST wake up to global climate engineering and recognize it as the polluting REALITY that it IS.

There are four honest mentalities regarding geoengineering:

1) AGAINST (activists who CARE about life-nature-planet-future)

2) FOR (“debunkers” & the corp/gov/biotech/geoengineering/dirty energy profiteers funding them)

3) APATHETIC (too self centered to notice or care either way)

4) STATUS QUO (the masses of groupthink/herd mentality duped by the disinformation campaign remaining in a vehement state of denial unwittingly doing its bidding).

Council on Foreign Relations Unilateral Planetary Scale Geoengineering 2008 Briefing Notes, since it IS a reality: http://www.cfr.org/content/thinktank/GeoEng_041209.pdf

If we question WHY disinformation is so rampant in social media, targeting those increasing awareness attempting to assassinate their character to discredit their efforts, the answer is clear, it’s a strategic attack to purposely suppress awareness and prevent outcry because “an ignorant public is a compliant public”.

Visit our other articles about social media trolls to learn more:

https://rebelsiren.wordpress.com/2014/07/22/the-cult-jim-jones-disciples-have-nothing-on-these-guys/

https://rebelsiren.wordpress.com/2014/07/08/the-rat-troll-is-feeling-pretty-invincible/

https://rebelsiren.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/dispelling-internet-disinformation-tactics-debunking-the-debunkers/

https://rebelsiren.wordpress.com/2013/04/01/corporate-disinformation-bloggers-exposed-please-dont-feed-the-trolls/

PROPAGANDA:
prop•a•gan•da, präpəˈgandə/noun
1. derogatory information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view; “he was charged with distributing enemy propaganda”. Synonyms: information, promotion, advertising, publicity, spin; disinformation, counter-information; historical agitprop; informal info, hype, plugging; puff piece; the big lie “the prophetic novel is about a government that controls the masses by spreading propaganda”; the dissemination of propaganda as a political strategy: “the party’s leaders believed that a long period of education and propaganda would be necessary”.

 

Scientist, Family Man, and Facebook Troll?…

Scientist, Family Man, and Facebook Troll?…

Neil Penn Facebook Profile

Meet Neil Pennington a.k.a. Neil Penn, Scientist, Family Man…  Troll.

Neil Pennington wears many hats, one of which is an active “troll” on facebook by way of a separate account with a shortened version of his name “Neil Penn”. In fact, “Neil Penn” happens to be on a list of known offenders that go around targeting people & awareness groups that he and his denier cult cronies “disagree” with, attempting to bait honest people into a debate to “prove them wrong”, disrespecting others’ right to share information; as well as, slandering leaders in the awareness movement using classic “character assassination” tactics attempting to “discredit” them in order to cast doubt on harmful aerial spraying happening globally. Why anyone would waste valuable time harassing people on facebook?

Well, it turns out that Neil Pennington is, in fact, a purveyor of dirty, unsustainable, profit-over-people, industrial activity since he profits from performing acoustic assessments for mining (coal,/gold), fracking, drilling, etc.; given this, it’s no surprise that he is a dirty energy troll/pro-geoengineering advocate, but what IS a surprise, is the amount of time he spends on facebook seeking out and attacking others. Neil, business owner and father of three, where DOES he find the time?

Below is a disallowed comment “Neil Penn” made on our article: https://rebelsiren.wordpress.com/2014 The Cult – Jim Jones’ disciples had nothing on these guys Again, why a “professional scientist” continues to resort to this level of immaturity, or find the time? The last line of the comment he wrote below is slightly amusing, yet disturbing that this man has any kind of clout in the world. Judging by his comment, as well as his unrelenting troll attacks on facebook, it appears that Mr. Pennington failed to learn socially acceptable graces during his vast “education”. This begs the question, if along with his GPA, his behavior was also a factor in why it took him so long to finally get his BS degree? This man serves as a classic example that education is not the same as intelligence.

While viewing the screenshot below, keep in mind that our “cult” article made absolutely NO reference whatsoever of “the scientific community being a cult”. To clarify, science isn’t the problem, irresponsible pseudo-science that puts profit above sustainability of the planet, is a catastrophic problem on a global scale; yet, the focus of our article is to raise awareness of the strategic troll attacks rampant on social media by the DENIER CULT (trolls/shills/brainwashed-masses) spouting text-speak about “contrail formation” disregarding actual scientific data relating to climate engineering, weather modification, or any other reality based information. Trolls demand “evidence”, then reject it when it’s presented.

Notice how Neil Penn refers to geoengineering as “the chemtrail hoax”, twisting it around in classic troll fashion. The term “shill” and “troll” are interchangeable, especially in his case. It’s too bad that Neil Penn is a willful accomplice to crimes against humanity, other than that, judging by the playful nature of his comment, he seems like a relatively fun guy. Anyone that’s an avid Monty Python fan can’t be all bad… can they? Let’s take a look.

CLICK SCREENSHOTS TO VIEW

According to his IP location, (a matter of public record), Neil Penn is based near Sydney, Australia, capital of New South Wales, not far from Newcastle, coincidentally, so is Neil Pennington, who often condescendingly boasts about his vast education and being a hot shot business owner. Where does Neil find the time for such rampant troll activity? Most educated people that own businesses are far too busy providing for their families to create fake accounts and go around harassing others on social media. If we examine Neil “Penn” a bit closer, we find that he seems to have nothing but time to devote to harassing others, rather than to his family. He created a (subsequently removed) facebook “fraudster” page that targeted an anti-geoengineering leader, as well as contributing to several other known fake pages.

Why do these “trolls” purposely seek out, target and attack others with whom they disagree? Who in their right minds operates like that? If you thought someone was a conspiracy nutter would anyone waste their valuable time seeking others out just to try to prove them wrong? Neil Penn and his accomplices exhibit blatant discrimination that should not be tolerated in social media forums.

The answer as to WHY becomes clear when we analyse their strategy (political tactics), motivation (purveyors of dirty, unsustainable science/paid forum poster shills/brainwashed deniers), and personality type (narcissistic disorder). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886914000324 AND  http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/climate_desk/2014/02/internet_troll_personality_study_machiavellianism_narcissism_psychopathy.html

Spectrum Acoustics Pty Ltd

Neil Pennington’s public facebook profile below:
(excluding the public profile photo at the time of this publishing of his three beautiful children in the pool).

Neil Pennington Facebook Page

Below is “Neil Penn’s” facebook profile. Nice deep BLUE sky, Neil, photoshop much? Where do skies exist on the globe look like this anymore? Not where any of us live, that’s for sure, even if it starts out blue, within a couple of hours, is COVERED in persisting, spreading, lingering, sprayed HAZE. Could it be that this beautiful photoshopped sky helps prove his far-fetched point that global climate engineering isn’t happening on any level, including experimentation?

According to Neil Penn and the rest of the denier cult “debunkers”, experimentation isn’t possible, has never, nor ever will, happen; despite the fact that experimentation is how science works. Anyone that has ever taken basic science in school, knows that experimentation is the essential element to any scientific project, this includes climate engineering. These trolls constantly speak of “science”, yet provide NONE, with the exception of regurgitating contrail formation text-speak inapplicable to what we observe in our global skies. What do YOUR skies look like in your part of the globe?

Neil Penn Facebook Profile

Neil Penn and pals target anyone and everyone that they believe has any influence raising awareness. They seek out and strategically attack their intended targets, opting to kick people when they’re down, often resorting to making things up if they can’t find anything else to exploit and pick on; is that their “job” perhaps? Either way, these narcissistic, psychotic trolls openly exhibit classic bully mentality with the maturity level of a twelve year old. Neil Penn is known for his insults, name calling, and general low level troll behavior you wouldn’t expect from an “educated business owner”, unless of course, he’s a raging sociopath with too much time on his hands.

A couple of Mr. Pennington’s projects that are of public record. I wonder if Australian environmental groups were too keen on these?

http://www.unitymining.com.au/wp-content/uploads/dargues/Approvals/Section%207_Final.pdf

http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/roadprojects/projects/sydney_region/south_west_sydney/northern_road_cranebrook/documents/the_northern_rd_submissions_report_appendices.pdf

http://www.majorscreek.org.au/book/export/html/247

Looks like there have been some serious environmental issues regarding the Dargues project: 

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/epamedia/EPAMedia13121602.htm

AND

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/epamedia/EPAMedia13080902.htm

Apparently, business is slow for Neil Penn and why he spends so much time internet trolling. Does he realise this is a prosecutable offence? http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/4259/internet-trolls-can-be-prosecuted-under-australian.aspx

Lord Neil Pennington
Lord Neil Pennington

Primary definition of the word, “propaganda“:
prop•a•gan•da, präpəˈgandə/noun
1. derogatory information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view; “he was charged with distributing enemy propaganda”. Synonyms: information, promotion, advertising, publicity, spin; disinformation, counter-information; historical agitprop; informal info, hype, plugging; puff piece; the big lie “the prophetic novel is about a government that controls the masses by spreading propaganda”; the dissemination of propaganda as a political strategy: “the party’s leaders believed that a long period of education and propaganda would be necessary”.

 

Photo Credit: Monty Python Life of Brian.

NP the mud covered prophet
If the mud fits…

 

Featured Image Source: https://www.ipredator.co/michael-nuccitelli-psyd-internet-trolls/

The CULT – Jim Jones’ disciples had nothing on these facebook trolls

The CULT – Jim Jones’ disciples had nothing on these facebook trolls

INTERNET TROLL DEFINITION

Internet Troll: An Internet Troll is a colloquial expression used to define an online user who uses Information and Communications Technology (ICT) to purposely and actively provoke, defame, anger, tease, flame, or incite other online users. More often than not, the Internet Troll does not know the target recipient(s) of their vitriolic statements and behaviors. Internet Trolls regularly appear in all forms of online mediums ranging from online gaming gatherings to chatroom and forum discussions.

When the Internet Troll’s inflammatory statements and actions do not include a direct or implied physical threat to the target(s), their behavior is categorizes as cyber harassment. If the Troll’s verbal assaults include direct or implied physical threats to their target(s), their actions are then defined as cyberstalking. Canadian researchers have concluded that internet trolls are at higher rates for narcissism, machiavellianism, psychopathy and sadism.

The motivations for an Internet Troll’s provocative, and often times, bizarre behaviors are numerous. Despite the variations in modus operandi, the vast majority of Trolls are seeking attention, recognition, stimulation pseudo-notoriety and retribution for some unknown perceived injustice. Although there is no hard evidence or clinical research validating the psychology of the Internet Troll, it is commonly believed that the “Veil of Anonymity” afforded to every online user inspire Trolls to engage in egregious behaviors.

SOURCE: https://www.ipredator.co/michael-nuccitelli-psyd-internet-trolls/

 

Psychology Today: “… the associations between sadism and GAIT (Global Assessment of Internet Trolling) scores were so strong that it might be said that online trolls are prototypical everyday sadists.” –

SOURCE: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists

Gauging the amount of hostile, full page comments I received from psychopathic sadists (see references above), and chose not to allow due to my comment policy stated at the end of the article that they obviously failed to comprehend, in response to Dispelling internet disinformation tactics – debunking the debunkers, many facebook troll-cult members, also known as trolls/shills/deniers/cyberbullies, were upset because they weren’t included in the list of known offenders and did not receive any attention. I decided to do this follow up piece and oblige their request for the spotlight, and offer a “heads up” to the unsuspecting social media public about the rampant troll-cult scouring the internet for the sole purpose of harassing others.

The following list is not exhaustive, it begins with their leader, and may also include other various geoengineering proponents, deniers & their supporters. All are PUBLIC facebook profiles. We will edit this post to include more screenshots of the over 200+ cult member profiles, as time allows.

This should suffice in giving this whiny, self righteous, bullying CULT all the attention they deserve for doing their worst to suppress awareness, including relentlessly attacking the character of anyone that dares to speak up to protect humanity; with their relentless and transparent tactics, displaying their selfish, narcissistic, anti-humanitarian behavior.

This CULT and its geoengineering proponents and/or “denial” supporters whether knowingly or unwittingly, target and publicly harass anyone that they perceive has “beliefs” that differ from their own. That is pure discrimination, yet is rampant on our social media forums, and will continue unless we start speaking out against it. A couple of these profiles may be actual names, but the majority are fakes, take a close look.

This CULT chooses to focus solely on proving others wrong, rather than doing anything constructive to benefit humanity. Their negativity is only overshadowed by their ignorance and/or willful suppression of awareness to aid and abet what is surely going to go down in history as the biggest crime against humanity this world will ever see, and undoubtedly the last because when the climate system collapses, there will be life on this planet no more.

How many of YOU have been targeted and bullied by the following CULT and its members?

9 Troll FB Profiles

ADD Troll FB Profiles

PRIMARY Troll FB Profiles

TROLLS

PRIMARY 4 Troll FB Profiles

Troll Message To Rebel Siren

Facebook Flip Off
Right back atcha

PRIMARY 7 Troll FB Profiles

PRIMARY 8 Troll FB Profiles

Some of these compiled screenshots include a few of their fake public pages designed to make fun of legitimate pages concerned with health and the environment, like Food Babe. All this cult knows how to do is attack, make fun of, and name call, just like bullies on the playground in elementary school.

4 Troll FB Profiles

PRIMARY 5 Troll FB Profiles

Paid Shill FAKE PROFILE

Capn Carl Gov Shill

Captain Carl The Chemtrail Pilot GOV SHILL

Rusty TannerFAKE facebook page targeting activist Russ Tanner. Character Assassination is the number one tactic designed to discredit people. Putting others down to make themselves appear “credible”. Report the FAKE PAGE on facebook to help get it promptly removed. It is targeting someone with an illness and illegally using Russ Tanner’s image. Despicable display of shillidiocy running amok.

Below is an example of how they spend their time, attacking whistle-blower Kristen Meghan’s inkwork? This is a perfect example of the cult putting others down to make themselves feel bigger. They pick on anything and everything in an attempt to discredit others. It’s a waste of valuable time and speaks volumes as to the lack of character of these cult disciples. Blank stare, soulless, lost. Sad that they can’t think of anything better to do with their time. Out of all the ills of our society and planet in desperate need of solutions, THIS is what they choose to focus on? Shameful. Such a disgrace to humanity. Incidentally, we love Kristen Meghan’s tatoos and see the trolls for what they are… insecure, ignorant bullies.

Screenshots 4 Troll Attack on Kristen Meghan

Screenshots 5 Troll Attacks on Kristen Meghan

Screenshots 6 Troll Attacks on Kristen Meghan

Getting into a “debate” with a cult member online is reminiscent of a grade school argument with a “copy cat” bully. When we say they should get their head out of the sand, they repeat, “get your head out of the sand”. When we say, wake up, they say, “wake up”, when we say that they are subscribing to pseudoscience, they repeat, “that’s pseudoscience”, except they usually misspell it. We recommend that honest people avoid their fake pages and refuse to get into futile debates with them for the aforementioned reasons. Save yourselves the frustration because the cult trolls are not worth your time.

The cult uses a tactic that likens those that are aware of geoengineering to religious zealots, but it’s in fact, that is precisely what THEY are. It is an incorrect description to say that there is “belief” in geoengineering; there is knowledge that it’s happening with an overwhelming sense of responsibility to our children, their future children, and all life on this planet, to do our best to use appropriate channels to put an end to this dangerous scheme.

It’s not like there is a “church of geoengineering” where people worship chem-planes, like the cult apparently does. Did you get a load of “International Chemtrail Association” listed above? Their motto is “darker, safer skies” or some drivel like that designed to ridicule the movement for health and sustainability that is beyond disrespectful to the efforts of all that are working diligently to save this planet and all life on it.  The denier cult is an affront to every living thing and the planet itself.

Makes us wonder if the deniers have ever stopped to consider the magnitude of the ramifications that will surely manifest when they end up wrong? How terribly ignorant and/or devious they’ll end up looking when the truth finally comes out into the open as it slowly and surely is. What are they getting out of such vehement denial without taking into consideration the consequences that their stance may be unfounded, as intelligent people would do? They exhibit the fervor of a CULT. Some of the cult members think it’s funny to be a paid shill and put it on their facebook profiles, others obviously couldn’t care less about future sustainability or life on this planet and that is their motivation, as their behavior clearly dictates.  If they had a shred of humanity, why would they be operating out of such zealot like behavior just to prove they’re in the majority? In true copycat fashion, the cult continues calling us the “status quo” while simultaneously claiming they are in the “majority”, but it cannot be BOTH. It’s either one or the other. Well, cult trolls, which is it? Are we in the “majority” or are you? Make up your minds because the revolving door of lies and betrayal to the human race is dizzying.

Why do the cult trolls waste their time on a bunch of “crazy conspiracy theorists that are not to be taken seriously” anyway?  What’s it to them?

Hmm, let’s think about the true motives behind their actions? Could it be deception and disinformation at work to suppress awareness and prevent public outcry because an ignorant public is a compliant public? BINGO.

Comments by honest people will be accepted. Troll comments will NOT and frankly, we don’t care how much the cult trolls whine about it, we laugh at their pathetic attempts to invade the blog with their rehearsed, memorized, regurgitating baseless spews, whining that they’re being “censored”, as if. There is a difference between censorship and having the right to not be discriminated against and abused. “Baseless” is another word they like mimicking, “you’re baseless“, usually misspelling “you’re”.

Again, since the cult members have the mentality of 12 year old bullies, we’ll spell it out in Pig Latin especially for them, “uckfae ouyae, ultcae”.

“The Cult” part two will be published shortly revealing more offenders to be on the lookout for.

Novim – just science. http://www.novim.org/projects/climate-engineering

Even if geoengineering weren’t happening already despite the overwhelming visible evidence we observe in the sky and conclusive lab results from all over globe, (we all know field experimentation is a crucial aspect of science despite the debunkers claims that no experimentation has been, or ever will, happen), then prospectively, it will only be a matter of time before it is openly implemented. Either way, why such vehement denial in the mainstream and all over social media? What would be in it for the denier cult trolls unless they’re either getting paid to suppress awareness, or have fallen prey to the  tactics used on them?

Integrated Assessment of Geoengineering Proposals.

http://www.iagp.ac.uk/

http://www.iagp.ac.uk/iagp-research

http://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/research/icas/physical-climate-change-group/current-research/iagp-integrated-assessment-of-geoengineering-proposals/

This one below left a (disallowed) comment comparing geoengineering awareness to a “cult“, haha! He couldn’t think of anything better than that? This is just another in the growing list of immature, self centered “copy cats” with no concern for humanity or sustainability of this planet, serving as the perfect example of everything this blog outlined above, proving the point. “Supastar DJ Bob” and all the other cult minions only have the capacity for mimicking and insults. Do we seriously want to listen to a word they have to say about science or anything else for that matter? Mick West must be so proud.

Don't drink the Kool-Aid or you'll end up like DJ Supaduh.
Don’t drink the Kool-Aid or you could end up like  “Supastar DJ Bob”

He’s Feeling Pretty – Portrait Of A Rat Troll

Portrait of a TROLL
“Relentless Australian Trolls”, RATs, can be prosecuted according to Australian law, click photo for more info.

TROLLS are everywhere, even the word “troll” is offensive. They have been systematically infiltrating social media for sinister purposes. Many of them are paid, hired by PR companies to spin an issue, sway public opinion, and cause debate and controversy where none previously existed, nor should. Check online employment venues for “forum poster” jobs. Trolls contribute to the ills of our society and are a virtual plague upon the planet by perpetuating everything that is destructive from promoting GMOs to geoengineering, to marketing, spamming, and selling us stuff we don’t need. This is a portrait of one such troll, an Aussie Rat Troll, quite common Down Under.

This troll (like all the others) claims it’s his “hobby” to bully, harass, ridicule and abuse honest people for the purpose of perpetuating the polluting and desecration of our planet, our health, and all life. He hides behind anonymity, creating several fake accounts all for the purpose of harassing an individual and group of people that he feels have “beliefs” that differ from his own.

The troll (of course) is associated with the metaflunkers (that’s right, meta-FLUNKers), and CONpseudoscience (pseudo-science at its worst), both sites ran by the gaming guru they worship and blindly follow, their lord and master, in a virtual DISINFORMATION CULT. Their “guru” is not an expert, but a mere gaming programmer with no expertise in atmospheric sciences, aviation, or meteorology. This CULT likens the effort to increase awareness about hazardous, risky weather and climate engineering programs, to “religious zealots”, when in reality, that is precisely what they are by blindly following the gamer and his nasty band of internet trolls.

Some trolls get compensated (shillidiocy) while others are mere sheep, brainwashed into blindly following the herd and unwittingly help do the dirty work by spreading around the propaganda (lies/disinformation). It’s like a mass Stockholm Syndrome where these egocentric follower’s limited intellects are held captive by their “god”, engulfed in narcissism, the gaming programmer, because their insecure need to “cling” and “follow” outweighs any sense of humanity that an intelligent independent thinker would have.

Trolls target videos on youtube, and social media including facebook, relentlessly harassing people, posting generic “contrail” formation text-speak, which has nothing to do with the issues being discussed, other than jet fuel pollution contributing to poor air quality. If we take a look at the history of this “debate”, they started out claiming that geoengineering wasn’t possible. However, once they could no longer refute the reality of it, they began claiming it isn’t “being done yet”, that we are “geoengineering the planet already”, that “planes cannot spray chemcials” (despite overwhelming facts that they can and do), and that all of the heavy persistent streaks we observe globally are mere “contrails”.

Ponder what this loathsome lot has to gain by disputing this issue. What is it to them? It’s a disinformation campaign, that’s what.

They work hard to incite violence using old political tactics. A primary tactic is to attack the character of every leader and whistle-blower that dares to speak out. If these are just regular people, why so many fake accounts? Why target only awareness videos on youtube? It’s a format, an obvious strategic attack of DISINFORMATION when you learn their tactics and begin paying closer attention.

Many people in the mainstream fall for these tactics due to cognitive dissonance or sheer brainwashing because they feel accepted into a group. It’s another form of “groupthink” comparable to a “religious cult”. Trolls are themselves the “zealots” and are doing extensive harm to our health and planet.

Truly intelligent people with the ability for critical thinking and that take the time to do research beyond the mainstream hype, never fall for this groupthink mentality, and because of that, are inevitably the ones targeted by these low level trolls.

Even the so called “educated” trolls that managed to pass enough courses for a degree, still lack the intelligence and critical thinking skills to think beyond their indoctrinations or stop to consider humanity rather than their own selfish existence. They merely memorize and regurgitate, nothing more, and can only be described as “educated idiots” since education is not the same thing as intelligence.

Depending on the field and intelligence quotient (or lack thereof), education can serve the purpose of indoctrination to perpetuate the system and suppress critical thinking and awareness, this is especially true in the field of “applied sciences”. Trolls with applied science degrees are the worst regarding arrogance and “god complex”. They’re out to destroy nature, make it better, improve it, completely disrespecting and destroying it in the process. Not all scientists, of course, many are highly intelligent forward thinkers. Please do not misinterpret the point.  Apparently, there is no room for morality, ethics, or basic respect in corporate industry, however. Profit over people, that’s the “bottom line”, isn’t it?

Let’s clarify, this is not an “anti-science” statement, as the trolls would no doubt claim. This is to point out the difference between IRRESPONSIBLE science, versus responsible science that seeks to work with nature, not against it, and advocate for a sustainable, healthy planet for the present, and future, generations.

The “Dr. Evils” of the world mentioned here, practice irresponsible science in their arrogance. They are routinely careless in their actions with no consideration for future consequences. Just look at our planet for the “evidence”. The desecration by the fossil fuel industry (connected to climate engineering despite their public “denial” tactic). Geoengineer David Keith is one example, he stated openly that geoengineering “is like free-riding on our grand-kids”. If you google the name & phrase, the first thing that comes up is metaflunk defending him and his statement.  Unsurprising, considering it’s their JOB and MISSION to deflect focus from these hazardous programs to prevent public outcry, because “an ignorant public is a compliant public” and they will do everything despicable to achieve this goal. It is an organized and strategic disinformation campaign.

For this purpose, trolls routinely create multiple fake facebook (along with other social media) accounts, including one facebook page that targets a well known leader in geoengineering awareness, using his name followed by the word “Fraudster”. Despite numerous reports to facebook and reports for removal of that fake harassing page, facebook turns a blind eye and allows it to remain. That page is an obvious fake and clearly VIOLATES facebook’s own “terms of service”, yet they refuse to take it down. Makes you wonder if there is funding involved. Facebook, care to answer why you’re allowing “the blunder from down under” to disgrace your venue?

If the head perpetrator troll that created a specific fraudster page attempts to feebly claim he is the inspiration for the artist rendering above, he will be admitting to his fake accounts, the harassment, and shillidiocy he spews all over facebook and elsewhere and that will be just cause for the removal of his fraudster page(s) on all of the social media venues he posted his derogatory attacks on. No names have been mentioned here, no photos, no specific information has been given other than pointing out the truth and using an artist’s image to depict it. DISCLAIMER: The above image is merely an abstract to bring attention to the rampant SHILLS a.k.a. “trolls”, infiltrating our online lives whose likeness to any specific troll, is purely coincidental.

Additionally, facebook could be considered an accomplice by contributing to the targeting and harassment of an individual due to differing beliefs, (let’s call it “religion” since that’s what the trolls inevitably liken geoengineering awareness to), hence, as such, should be held responsible for allowing blatant discrimination to run unchecked.

Should we allow TROLLS to run rampant on social media for the sole purpose of attacking, bullying, and harassing people or groups whom “they do not agree with”? If you have a facebook profile or page and are familiar with the “fraudster” page using a well known geoengineering awareness leader’s name, please report it, as well as report all fraudster pages and fake troll profiles that you come across. If we band together and keep reporting these RATS, there is a better chance they will get justly SHUT DOWN. The disrespectful “fraudster” pages are an affront, not only to the reputable leader it is targeting, but to everyone engaging in honest discussions, as well as all of humanity.

To learn more about internet disinformation tactics in order to recognize when you’re dealing with a “troll” versus a real person with a differing “opinion”: https://rebelsiren.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/dispelling-internet-disinformation-tactics-debunking-the-debunkers/

Dispelling Internet Disinformation Tactics – Debunking the Debunkers

Dispelling Internet Disinformation Tactics – Debunking the Debunkers

Trolls
Click Photo for “Disinformation – How It Works” on Alt-Market.com

Internet TROLLS, also known as “forum posters”, “internet bloggers,” or if we call them what they really are, SHILLS, are increasingly being recruited by corporations or subcontracted agencies not only for marketing (Exposing Cyber Shills and Social Media’s Underworld) or political purposes (Definition of a sock puppet), but also, to distract from the truth to prevent public outcry about hazardous programs such as geoengineering (climate engineering & weather modification), dirty archaic energy (oil-Keystone XL pipeline, gas-fracking), the dangers of genetically modified foods (GMOs, big ag, biotech, warfare chemical companies), vaccine risks, Smart Meters, 9/11 questions, and EVERY issue where profiteers put their bottom line and lust for control, over the destruction of the planet at the expense of our health & sustainability of the planet.

Internet trolls are often employees that answered a job ad on craigslist or some other online employment venue. The geoengineering trolls, specifically, are employed by the two main disinformation sites, metabxxx and contrailsciexxx, both ran by a gaming programmer. He and his band of internet trolls lack expertise in science, meteorology or any other field related to geoengineering, yet claim to be “experts” and fancy themselves “debunkers”. “Shillidiocy” is a term that best describes the rapidly growing industry of people ready and willing to sell out humanity for a few pennies per comment. Disinformation has been used throughout history for political manipulation and those same tactics are being utilized today by trolls hired to infiltrate social media.

1) CHARACTER ASSASSINATION(Psychological Warfare – discredit, distract, intimidate, frustrate, divide & conquer) – Disinformation shills (trolls)  attack the character of leaders in a movement to discredit them, thus discrediting the movement. A main character assassination tactic is to highlight any negative or perceived flaw of an otherwise reputable person, whether true or false, to discredit him/her in an attempt to invalidate their viewpoint and make it appear baseless, for the sole purpose of detracting focus from the information they are sharing. Trolls often “make stuff up” if they can’t find anything real to highlight for this goal, after all, shills are paid liars. Trolls are hired to make leading or inflammatory comments for the sole purpose of baiting their targets to create a “controversial debate” where none truly exists. They often resort to the “Trojan Horse” tactic to elicit an emotional response from their targets, frustrate, and evoke hostility with the intent of twisting it around to make the person look volatile, a classic “character assassination” tactic to discredit people, making them appear weak and unstable. Trolls frequently provoke people into a heated argument, and sometimes will go so far as to “report” them as being a “threat” to get them kicked off the forum. Another trick these liars are taught to do is to use semantics to twist people’s words around and make it seem as though they’ve lied, to discredit them and works hand in hand with the Straw Man tactic. These are all character assassination attempts that you will easily recognize happening in social media forums once you become familiar with these tactics.

2) DEMANDING IMPOSSIBLE PROOF – The most common tactic used by online trolls is to “demand evidence”, then ignore it when it’s presented and continue to demand proof that is impossible for anyone to obtain. Regardless of credible data presented by their targets in public forums, trolls repeatedly deem it as “irrelevant” and continue to demand unattainable proof. The purpose of which, is to dismiss any and all legitimate information (actual evidence), found by those take the time to do real research beyond the disinformation site links, and to distract from the fact the trolls fail to present any credible information themselves. It also keeps their targets scurrying and frustrated, giving trolls the illusion of having the upper hand. Often, disinformation shills pose as a supporter of the truth, or “friendly folks on the fence” politely asking questions, in a sly attempt to later discredit the movement. Trolls posing as friendly allies will post long, incoherent diatribes on fake blogs & articles, or inflammatory comments, for the purpose of associating the movement with insanity. Other times they will act as “the voice of reason” to make it appear as though any presented data isn’t strong enough, and they offer to play “devil’s advocate” to “help” the movement, with the goal of rendering any and all data as invalid regardless of how legitimate the source; perpetuate doubt, and discredit the movement.

3) DOMINATE THE THREADTrolls interject themselves into productive web discussions in order to make themselves appear credible as though they have a “real” argument, where none actually exists. Their job is to create controversy and instigate a “debate” by pretending to be “a regular person with an opposing opinion participating in normal discourse“, when in fact, they are paid shills that get compensated to scour the net and attack awareness videos on youtube, blogs, articles, public facebook pages, and other social media forums; they also brainwash their followers to do their bidding, using “chemtrails” as their Manchurian Candidate trigger word. Trolls often post links from metaxxxx or conxxxxxscience regurgitating the generic science of how normal contrails are formed, inapplicable to weather modification and climate engineering activity. They try to lure people to those disinformation sites to attempt to convince them that the persistent, spreading streaks we observe in the sky are “normal contrails”, yet they dismiss any additional information on climate engineering with verifiable references found on scholar databases. Another tactic is to claim that to advocate against toxic climate engineering is somehow “taking away from more important issues” like cutting C02 emissions, when ironically, it’s the SAME cause, and if we connect the dots, it trails back to big biotech, oil, gas & coal funding climate engineering.  The trolls relentlessly keep commenting on threads to dominate the discussion with the intent to keep their comments at the very top. They also vote their comments up and their target’s comments down, (if the forum offers that feature). This is evident when you become familiar with their methods. I have yet to see a disinformation shill post a reputable link, or any link, other than from those two disinformation sites or some equally generic source lacking verifiable references, or that pertains to what we observe happening in many regions of our globe. They intentionally divert attention away from credible documentation, dismissing it without due diligence. They often regurgitate harassing insults (especially on youtube), and repeat generic jargon about how water vapor condensation trails are formed, which has nothing to do with the persistent, spreading, lingering trails we observe covering & whitening the sky, blocking the sun, that is being done as scientific research, “field experiments”, the prelude to officially implementing global climate engineering programs.

4) PRE-WRITTEN SCRIPTED RESPONSES – (cut & paste comments): Trolls are supplied with a list or database of preplanned talking points in a boilerplate format designed as offensive maneuvers and deceptive comments to create an argument for the sole purpose of deflecting from the truth because that is what they have been recruited to do. Geoengineering “chemtrail debunker” trolls are notorious for this, and note they never actually “debunk” anything. All they do is deflect from reality and try to CAST DOUBT and keep the “denial” tactic going so the profiteers of climate engineering and weather control can continue to suppress public outcry in order to continue aerial spraying of heavy metals and toxic chemicals into our global atmosphere, jeopardizing our health and future sustainability of the planet, and prevent us from uniting to take appropriate legal action to stop this blatant crime against humanity. If you pay close attention and track the trolls, you will see that they repetitively post routine boilerplate comments all over social media forums.

5) FALSE ASSOCIATION – The goal of “false association” is to associate supporters of the movement with negative labels such as “paranoid conspiracy theorist” or “anti-science” to make their targets appear crazy or ignorant, and ultimately discredit the movement. Trolls deliberately associate the movement with far fetched concepts like “big foot”, aliens, “moon hoax”, false flag conspiracies, etc., because of the associated negative connotations. The goal is to create biases and dissuade people from objectively examining credible information presented. This works hand in hand with #1 (character assassination), and the “Trojan Horse” troll (sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule, engaging them in a hostile argument to try to discredit them, also known as the “attack the messenger” ploy). Online trolls often call their targets derogatory names such as “chemtard”, “conspiratard”, “chemnut”, “ignorant”, or “liar”, attempting to invalidate anything they say regardless of the truth of it. Trolls often attempt to make it appear that their targeted group incites violence (tying in with character assassination). Trolls will post hostile comments such as “let’s shoot down those planes” on public forums such as Skyder Alert by pretending to be a supporter for the sole purpose of discrediting a peaceful movement.

6) FALSE MODERATION – The disinformation tactic of pretending to be the “voice of reason” in an attempt to move people away from what is clearly true, into the murky waters of “doubt” where the truth becomes “relative.” And, when that inevitably fails, they resort to antagonizing and goading people with insults, name calling, and bullying. They routinely chide and taunt people to harass them into emotional responses with the goal of making them look foolish or unstable in an attempt to deflect focus from their point and invalidate any credible data they may be presenting. Do not let them engage you in an argument and provoke you into hostility, because it is a deliberate move to discredit you. Refuse to take the bait.

7) STRAW MAN and “AD HOMINEM” ARGUMENTS – A common tactic is that the troll will accuse his opposition of subscribing to an obscure point of view, then attack that point of view (Straw Man). Trolls fabricate a “perspective” and then rebut it, regardless of the fact that his target never made any such comment. Trolls frequently use the Straw Man tactic, for example: “you’re a polluter and pro-fossil fuel, because all of your talk about climate engineering is taking attention away from the real problem of C02 emissions“. This is the kicker, it’s safe to say that humanity unanimously agrees we must end our dependency on fossil fuels and implement clean, sustainable technology for the future (that’s why there is a movement against climate engineering, “spraying pollution to solve pollution” is insanity), but the minute we state this in a reply we have “taken the bait” because the troll immediately shifts gears and attacks making it obvious it was a tactic to engage us in a fictitious debate to deflect focus from the dangers of climate engineering, (the aerially spraying of toxins into the atmosphere, wider reaching and far worse than the problem of ground level pollution). The troll uses conjecture, ridicule, and accusation to try and prove himself as credible by attempting to discredit others, and often exclaims, “you have no argument, that is just ad hominem”! Ironically, that is exactly what he is doing. The troll is trained to appear confident, unwavering, and that he is undoubtedly right, when in reality, it’s the exact opposite. He is a paid liar and his goal is to create doubt and keep the truth covered up. Some trolls have even begun to use environmental icons or the Guy Fawkes mask (symbol of Anonymous) as a profile pic and more realistic usernames now that we are becoming aware of their tactics. On youtube, the troll username, “Kevin Schmidt”, is a prime example.

8) POSING LEADING QUESTIONS and “PLAYING NICE” – (with actual examples of real paid troll’s comments). When the internet shill realizes people are aware of his tactics, he will then try to play nice, act innocent, and pose a seemingly “harmless” leading question, example posted below.  The following bold, italic quotes are actual troll comments made by username William01702 who is known to routinely attack youtube geoengineering awareness videos:

William01702, (a known disinformation troll) used tactic #s 6, 8, and 2 to troll the video (link below) of the courageous Kristen Meghan, who stands strong to do what is right in the face of adversity to warn people about geoengineering and the disinformation sites. If you watch the video and listen to her, it is clear what is happening with the rampant disinformation in our mainstream; PAID shills are ready and willing to contribute to the demise of our world, and sell out their humanity to perpetuate lies for a measly buck. The shill “Hama Neggs” also trolled it with some derogatory comments about Kristen Meghan using #1 (character assassination).  Troll’s comments may, or may not, get deleted by the page moderator; but if they remain, notice the date and how quickly they found it. It’s their job to scour the net and attack, so in time, even if theirs get deleted, more paid trolls will appear.  If you check other awareness videos, you’ll see the same usernames in action.  Save LI Forum – 09 – Kristen Meghan – Geo-engineering

(William01702‘s trolling comment uses tactics 6, 8, 2, posted below. If you examine the troll’s initial approach and compare it to the subsequent comments, you’ll see the contrast, and the tactics become crystal clear. Frankly, no effort is required to expose these paid trolls, they do that themselves as their “bait  and hook” routine becomes glaringly obvious when you know their strategy)…

William01702 (troll):  Could you please tell me what “disinformation” you have found on Metabunk or contrailscience? I mean, you claim the information isnt factual, and then provide no evidence to support such a claim. Why?”… “It really is a legitimate question which deserves an answer. Despite what paranoid liars like GalileoGalileisGhost say.(If William01702 was just a random viewer, why would he care whether those sites have been exposed as disinformation, and “demand proof”, unless he IS an associate (a paid shill)? The answer becomes evident if you notice how he followed with the classic “false association” & “Trojan Horse” tactic to disparage shill buster, GalileoGalileisGhost. Would a random user that’s not associated with those disinformation sites have cause to do this)?

William01702 also posted this comment on a different thread, (note the contrast when confronted for his shill activity): “ I’m not a troll I’m just someone who is better educated in atmospheric science and aviation that all chemtards, combined.” (notice his derogatory use of the word CHEMTARDS a classic Trojan Horse move).

William01702 also wrote this:  “Chemtards couldn’t be more stupid if they wanted to be. You people are evil alarmists who spread fear, hate, and ignorance based on a lack of education. I pity the chemtards!” (does that sound like someone educated in atmospheric sciences or anything else for that matter)?

William01702 (a.k.a. “TheVoiceOfReason” on youtube) also wrote this on an entirely different thread, “Oh really and where do they say that THIS trail has ANYTHING to do with what they have “admitted to”. NO WHERE! It’s hilarious that you people read about some basic testing and then assume everything you see in the sky must be related to such testing. Chemtards are idiots! Oh, and BTW show me where anyone has admitted to any such thing! If you say HR2977 you’re a fucking moron!”

William01702 also wrote this on yet a different thread (verbatim quote [sic] including errors and profanity): “Tat should have read “because you are too stupid and lazy to understand basic fucking science”. But, does it matter?! Will it change anything?! No, you will always assume that just because you hate/fear the government that it must mean that you and your chemtard friends must be right about the trails in the sky. Nevermind the fact that you have never actually studed these subjects! You have visited conspiracy sites! You know it all real pilots are just STUPID for going to school for years!”

William01702 also wrote this on yet a different thread: “Poor chemtards unable to understand he difference between an intentional nefarious release of chemicals and business as usual”.

William01702 also wrote this on yet a different thread: “Why do you people pretend to understand that minor differences in temperature, engine power settings, engine types, and engine size can result in differences in trails, when its obvious that you are all fucking clueless!!! This video isn’t evidence of anything more than the ignorance of chemtards”!

William01702 also wrote this on a video about chemical fallout from geoengineering (notice the pattern from the previous comments): “Yup, I’m sure that she is a moron. And so are you. There is ZERO evidence that this “affliction” has ANYTHING to do with the trails in the sky. NONE! It’s nothing more than paranoid fantasy made up by those who like to pick at their skin. And you are right, she IS just one moron in a line of many. By the way accepting ignorant bullshit from OTHER paranoid losers on the internet is NOT “research”.”

William01702 also wrote these various comments on various different videos as well: “Stupid chemtards”, “Idiot”“Moron”, AND “that is technology that is not only public knowledge, but is highly regulated. It also has nothing to do with any trails in the sky. That’s the problem with you people. You are completely ignorant but are too stupid to know it”!

Compare the subsequent comments with the name calling & insults, to the first one that was on a video where his disinformation sites were brought to light and notice how he tried to recover by looking innocent & friendly despite his hostility and antagonistic comments on other awareness videos.

debunker-insults-meme

Who are these trolls that have time to sit around and make comments on youtube all day and night, and WHY target and attack awareness videos? The answer is clear, they are DISINFORMATION SHILLS. We have screenshots in the likely event that this loathsome user attempts to attack this blog and denies ever making those comments. So, unless he deletes all of his comments off of all the youtube awareness videos he has attacked, and closes his account, (let’s hope he does), you can plainly see his existing comments (and more) on youtube by checking his page activity or tracking him on awareness videos. The trolls get compensated to BAIT you and LURE you to those disinformation sites.

Yes there are gov paid trolls
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/yes-there-are-paid-government-trolls-on-social-media-blogs-forums-and-websites

This is a facebook thread with an epic example of the rampant shillidiocy on our social media forums.  https://www.facebook.com/usatoday/photos/a.100797840666.101835.13652355666/10151977186095667/ Many of the facebook shills attacking the honest people trying to raise awareness on that post are listed in “The Cult” article below. These denier cult members call others the “sheep” or “cult” because it’s clearly what they are and they’ve either been brainwashed into, or are compensated for, spreading disinformation and LIES: The CULT – Jim Jones’ disciples had nothing on these guys

 This is a growing list of known geoengineering (chemtrails) trolls: William01702 (youtube troll) ALSO uses youtube aliases, “William1965“, “William Noble“, “TheVoiceOfReason“, and it’s highly likely that he uses several other aliases as well.

William is joined by known shills such as Baronstone, Hama Neggs, Fred Lee, Lizoir, chavspotter, Terry Ram, Nwoflyer, thechief762, epsilon892, siouxperb5570, PM011, Phouse 1512, Niglet Gook, Belfrey1, aszi77, Jazzaconda, Baba Loo, Zygote, MrFubar75, “Kevin Schmidt”, ManicDeprescion, Zaparooni Zap, Windowpane767, Jack Haveman, Tomáš Fedor6, Andrew Buck, StratMatt777, Kyong Chinpao, Sgt. Rock, James Richard Tyrer (facebook troll), Miguel Angel Miguel (facebook troll that clams to have a high I.Q. and hold SEVEN scientific degrees, yet, in reality works as a balloon clown), silversaver82, Bruce Campbell, NeurOn911, ibtank, Arthur Hunt, Steve Funk, Todd Cory, TheVoiceOfReason679 (William Noble), mrstuperstefan, and several others, including Peter Harris, Khan Trayles (“con trails”), “International Chemtrail Association – ICA (advocating “dimmer, safer skies” by means of aerosol injection), Argo Rancor, Peter Greenall, Jeff Lindquist, Jay Uzinato, Star Bricker, Richard Johnston-bell, Portia Plantago-Lanceolata, Eman Sugob (“bogus name” spelled backwards), Rusty Kilpatrick, Douglas E. DeVries, Tim Coles, Yuri Zephyros a.k.a. Ross Marsden, Rescheckle Berglesteinowitz, Diego de la Vega, Rawley Bates, Serge A. Storms, George Salbert, Danni Bannanni, Jae Squared, Peter Greenall, Brian Real, Elizabeth Tague, Peter Dellys, Joe Gunzliano, Neil Pennington, a.k.a “Neil Penn”, (Australian shill with fake accounts on facebook, a self professed “PhD candidate”, that makes a living from unsustainable dirty energy practices such as gold mining, excavating, fracking, oil drilling; a blatant purveyor of geoengineering whose “hobby” is trolling and attacking the character of others running a facebook “fraudster” page to disparage a leader in the awareness movement -since removed), see: Neil Pennington aka “Neil Penn” – Rebel Siren – WordPress.

The CULTJim Jonesdisciples had nothing on these guys, an article exposing facebook shills and the brainwashed deniers that help do their bidding

ALL of the usernames above, and more, have all been identified as shills (aka “trolls”) infiltrating social media, utilizing the same tactics and associated with the two notorious disinformation sites, recruited by a mere gaming programmer, the granddaddy of them all, Mick West, (or at least that’s the public name he uses). The above list does not include specific GMO shills, however, when your recognize their tactics, they’re easy to spot. A few GMO shill usernames our team spotted on youtube are DeadFishFactory, Supercorrector1, David Ashlin, and “matthew gasiewki”, for example. On facebook Farmer Hank, Billy Snapp, and Joe DaFarmer, (along with several others). Side note, notice how the geoengineering trolls often claim to bepilots” or “scientists“, and the GMO trolls often claim to be “farmers” or “scientists“. See the pattern?

The reason these shills’ names are being published is to increase awareness and alert the honest public about which usernames are the most prolific, to expose the deceit & lies prevalent on our social media forums. The shills’ format is always the same and they often attack in teams to “back each other up”.  Anyone that does a little digging will find these same usernames frequently darkening awareness videos all over youtube, regurgitating insults, performing their usual antagonistic, tactical routine, and attempting to lure people to disinformation sites (metabxxx & contrailsciexxx) as most of them get compensated for it.

UPDATE 3/23/2014:  Unsurprisingly, the troll William01702, WordPress username “William Noble”, attempted to leave the following comment on this blog. It has been copied & pasted verbatim for observation purposes. Rather than allowing this known troll to post a comment to harass people with his antagonistic shillidiocy, examine it to identify the disinformation tactics he used:

I am william01702. You people should stop blaming others for being more intelligent than you. It’s not about “tactics”. It’s about pointing out ignorant fear mongering. Nothing more. I’m still waiting for someone..anyone…to provide evidence that the information provided on contrailscience or metabunk concerning the trails in the sky is in error.

According to the blog stats, “William Noble” a.k.a. William01702 AND “TheVoiceOfReason” did not click one single link provided in the body of this blog, do his due diligence, or intelligently attempt to refute any of the information therein. He merely regurgitated the usual harassing insults and conjecture, continuing to “demand evidence” without any due diligence on his part, and in doing so, he has only served to confirm the disinformation tactics running rampant in social media today.

IP addresses are public record, therefore, it is not only legal to publish them, but encouraged, in order to help keep abuse off of social media. The IP information of WordPress username “William Noble” a.k.a. William01702, can be found through the link below. This includes his general location and the contact information of his provider, Verizon Online LLC, with a phone number to report abuse (1-214-513-6711), so anyone that this troll has bullied & harassed on youtube or elsewhere, can (and should) report him directly to his internet service provider:

http://www.ipaddress-finder.com/?ip=74.104.124.105

When known troll William01702 commented on this blog, his public information was provided, including his username, email (removed) and PUBLIC IP address as follows:

“William Noble’s” Public IP INFO:

IP: 74.104.124.105, pool-74-104-124-105.bstnma.fios.verizon.net

IP: http://www.ipaddress-finder.com/?ip=74.104.124.105

William01702 has attempted to make several more abusive comments, using another WordPress username “thefactsmatter” coming from an IP address at Longwood Medical, Cambridge, MA: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/LMA-4.html  Comments by honest people offering input are welcome considering that there are three honest mindsets regarding climate engineering; those for it, those against it, and those that have fallen prey to the mainstream denial tactic and remain unaware.  However, ABUSIVE comments by known TROLLS, as well as “baiting” comments, will not be accepted, no matter how politely worded. This is not “censorship”, this is HUMANITY fed up with deceit.

As William01702 has proven, SHILLIDIOCY is rampant in social media. Less frequently, you’ll see these strategies mimicked by others in the mainstream that have willfully succumbed to cognitive dissonance and easily fallen prey to the disinformation tactics that have been used on them. These duped followers seem happy to regurgitate the lies they have been told and are content to post links only from those disinformation sites, while refusing to look at any other credible data presented to them. It’s like a mass Stockholm Syndrome in which their limited intellects are easily held hostage by their disinformation captors, and they’ve fallen “in love” with Mick We$t and his band of marauding minions. These victims of mass brainwashing also exhibit the common trait among trolls, of refusing to examine credible, verifiable, REAL data (such as several scholarly documents that can be found through this link): http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=geoengineering+modeling+studies&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ei=e-q_UcHDCMjPiwLk4YEY&ved=0CC0QgQMwAA).

Sadly, people’s refusal to examine any data beyond the disinformation sites, means success for the disinformation campaign.  Getting the public to do their bidding, not only meets the goal of “divide and conquer” in the battle to pit us against each other, it keeps us distracted, engaged in their fictitious debate, and prevents us from focusing on the fact that heavy metals such as aluminum, barium, and strontium, and other toxic chemicals such as sulphuric acid, and silver iodide, are being sprayed into our air supply globally for the purpose of Weather Modification and Climate Engineering.  In this war on awareness, the truth becomes irrelevant, and the sleepwalkers, happy to remain blissfully ignorant, are proud to belong to the band of trolls that have, ironically, convinced them that we are the “ignorant” ones, and that they are the geniuses that have all the answers. To deny something that one knows nothing about and being staunchly unwilling to investigate or even consider that a possibility exists beyond their limited scope, is the highest form of ignorance.

The telltale difference between mass cognitive dissonance and a paid internet troll, is that many trolls have generic or offensive usernames, no profile pic, a generic cartoon pic, a celebrity pic, and recently, some trolls are using an environmental icons, “chemtrail pics”, Guy Fawkes mask (Anonymous), kittens, and “common” first & last names (no doubt fake) to trick people into thinking they’re an “ally” (like “Kevin Schmidt” on youtube). They are easily recognizable if you click around and track their previous comments on other threads, you will see that they have attacked using the repetitive format, and frequently try to lure people to their disinformation sites, where they get compensated to engage them in a futile “debate”, waste their time and distract them from spending time increasing awareness in their local community, and doing REAL research on geoengineering.

Don’t let the trolls bait you, lure you, or cause you to feel stupid for considering that geoengineering is a reality, because it’s just a ploy to suppress your awareness and they get PAID to do it. Keep watching the sky and research information beyond the fixed mainstream search engines. Watch the documentaries, Look Up! and What in the World are They Spraying?, take notes and look up the information presented (also notice the amount of trolls that attack those awareness videos)! The TRUTH is there for anyone that is intelligent enough to look past the deceit & lies.

WHAT YOU CAN DO TO AVOID THE TROLLS

1)     Never “reply to” them, (do not take the bait).

2)     REPORT them, because what they’re doing is a form of cyber-BULLYING and SPAM.

3)     On your page, DELETE their comments and BLOCK/BAN them.

4)   Keep a list of known troll’s usernames that you have had contact with and publish it on your page to help expose their tactics and warn others to avoid the troll bait.

Share this information to increase awareness and disempower their lies.

Visit reputable sites such as  Global Skywatch for more information about how geoengineering adversely affects our health, and is damaging our planet’s ability to sustain life. Credible documentation irrefutably proving that geoengineering is a reality, can be found through Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America: http://www.pnas.org solar+radiation+management

Additional troll’s usernames that have attacked this article on Reddit and setting a great example of the above tactics, voting points down, insults, and living up to their growing reputation are; adamwho, loliamhigh, ssn697, and herkimer (with the best example yet: Those are the exact same methods that the conspiratards have been using for years. Something tells me that this idiot is just projecting his emotional and intellectual failures on others.”). “His”? That shows a complete lack of observation on the part of herkimer in addition to his other ridiculous and offensive insults. More names will be added as they appear. A great big THANK YOU to all the trolls that are stepping up to the plate and exposing their own tactics with their comments, thus, providing “PROOF” that they are, in fact, disinformation shills.   http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiratard/comments/1wcoz9/it_appears_they_are_becoming_aware_of_our_tactics/

Additional References

Unmask Wikipedia sock puppets by the way they write – New Science Magazine

Internet Trolls Cyber Harassment, Hecklers & Provocateurs – ipredator.com

Video by Freeman Human below lists more youtube trolls:

To the commenter originating from a blocked IP address in Niedersachsen, Germany (“Josh”): This article is not “going after” particular “users”, it is shining light on shill/troll tactics and merely providing common usernames to watch out for, along with an example of one such “troll” that continues to rampantly attack honest people having discussions on awareness videos on youtube. This user has several different accounts in which to do this. The reason a specific example was provided is certainly not to single out any particular shill/troll, but, to show the honest people out there, when to recognize a SHILL (troll), from a gullible denier that has fallen prey to the tactics designed to suppress awareness and prevent public outcry.

Too many honest people mistakenly engage in futile conversations with shills/trolls. Considering that there is NO DEBATE, as the “debate” is an intentionally concocted veil to mask reality, then there cannot possibly be “differing opinions”.  Let’s rephrase by stating that comments by non-shills, in other words, REAL PEOPLE WITH HONEST INPUT are welcome.  Thank you for pointing out the need for clarification, it’s much appreciated. The bottom line of it all, is that our planet is being ravaged, polluted, desecrated to the point of becoming uninhabitable, what further “FACTS” or “proof”  are required? (this question is purely rhetorical).

Getting caught in the web of the purposeful “argument” and feverishly trying to “prove” the obvious, is counterproductive; a grand waste of time (something we are running out of). To make it clear, debunking the debunkers focuses on shining light on the tactics that suppress awareness in the mainstream, and if applicable, using live examples to help do this. Trolls/shills/debunkers, intention is to thwart awareness, and those of us that care about the planet and have compassion for humanity, intend to raise the collective awareness that has been severely suppressed in the mainstream courtesy of the often clumsily obvious, but infrequently cleverly disguised, efforts of the DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN, including all shills/trolls/cyberbullies that either purposely, or unwittingly, assist in crimes against humanity.

Thank you for your politely worded comment, however, we, as a species, do not have the time to waste spitting hairs, it’s that simple. Whether your comment was a subversive effort or not, is truly of no consequence. Thank you.  ~Rebel Siren

Stay aware of fake social media profiles, accept friend requests only from those you know and trust.

Paid Shill Troll fb profile

COMMENT POLICY

It is this blog’s right to choose not to be harassed, ridiculed, discriminated against, and abused by paid shills, ignorant hater trolls with too much time on their hands, or anyone else that succumbed to status quo “cult programming” by the aforementioned disinformation sites. This is not “censorship”, it is a conscious choice. We choose positive energy, and it is our unalienable RIGHT to keep our blog AND our world CLEAN and FREE from negativity, lies, hate, and malice.

We’re all about LOVE, therefore, entire pages full of abusive, insulting lies, revealing your true colors, (shades of skidmarks on the underwear of society), will not be accepted, nor will ever so polite “baiting” comments. Did you actually read this blog or just blindly attack? Your tricks are obvious. It doesn’t take a genius to recognize your rehearsed, prefabricated, repetitive spews all over social media forums. Whether you’re a paid shill or just a duped follower, you reject truth, respect, common courtesy, or anyone’s opinion that cares about life and the planet, opting to remain in your heinous, dark existence, thriving on the destruction you are perpetuating. Simply put, you are an affront to every living creature, and the planet itself.

Anyone with a conscience would be ashamed to be a paid shill, troll, or cyberbully, but instead the lot of you wallow in your narcissism, your inflated ego superseding any sense of humanity that an otherwise intelligent, caring person with integrity would have. Internet troll personality study: Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, sadism Given the level of your immaturity and self centered bully mentality, perhaps the only language you’ll truly understand is Pig Latin, so here goes: “uckfae ouyae, itchesbae.”

~Rebel Siren

Beware of FAKE facebook pages often created by trolls create to impersonate, deceive, and harass those that dare to speak out for a better world, take caution when “liking” any social media page to be certain it’s real. Also, be careful and discerning with memes and posts you share to not inadvertently (unintentionally) spread disinformation. To all the good people out there battling trolls, stand strong, you are NOT ALONE.

Disinformation Strategies Exposed – Please Don’t Feed The Trolls

Disinformation Strategies Exposed – Please Don’t Feed The Trolls

Troll Photo

The hired tactical attack team of “disinformation bloggers”, employed by the corporate public relations spin machine, are up to no good, as usual. They stop at nothing, using age old political strategies such as mudslinging, Straw Man techniques, character assassination, semantics, etc., in an effort to discredit the truth and make advocates of a better world appear weak and baseless.  These shills (aka “trolls”) dominate video threads and articles with their antagonistic comments designed to create doubt and hostility, perpetuating corporate deceit to suppress awareness and prevent public outcry.

I wasn’t aware of how rampant “disinformation bloggers” were until recently, after battling some very vile “trolls” on YouTube awareness videos.  I started noticing that they were all using the SAME comments, same tactics over and over, and I dug around and found the same usernames on similar awareness videos about GMOs, Weather Modification, vaccine risks, Geoengineering, etc.; each regurgitating exactly the same prefabricated “cut ‘n paste” comments, tailored to the issue they’re attacking, but utilizing the same strategy nonetheless.

Some have been at it longer and perfected ad-libs making it a little more difficult to recognize them, and some claim to be “highly educated” with extensive knowledge in “science”, (if you look carefully, you’ll notice they employ the SAME tactics), while the newbies are much more obvious. I have seen these same tactical attacks not only on YouTube, but on facebook pages, blogs, and every other website or news source that uncovers the truth about GMOs, Geoengineering, vaccine risks, etc.  If you pay close attention, you’ll become all too familiar with their repetitive tactics and be able to instantly recognize these hired corporate shills that work so hard to detract from the truth, push their corporate employer’s agenda, and stymie any and all constructive comments that are geared towards raising awareness and finding solutions to create a healthier world.

Something that I learned the hard way is that in order to effectively suppress their negative comments, and hopefully get them off the thread altogether, is to never, under any circumstances, reply to them directly, especially on YouTube.  Always use the main comment box, not “reply to”.  It is also important to ignore their name calling and insults, (even though it’s tough), because no matter how great your comeback is, how truthful, insightful, and based on indisputable, verifiable fact, they will twist it around to use against you and keep on spewing their antagonistic negativity, calling you names like “moron” and “idiot”.  It will become a never ending battle because they are PAID to be relentless!  It’s their “job” to deflect focus from the real issue, which is the corporately controlled, profit driven, toxic, genetically engineered system for which they are hired shills.  Deleting their posts and/or blocking them is the best option, because they are not real folks engaging in healthy discourse, they are an organized corporate tactical attack team. Once you learn their tactics, you’ll easily recognize the difference.

Another topic that the GMO shills have begun to bring up is “climate change and climate science“. At first I thought it was a strategy to change the topic from the dangers of GMOs, (since changing topics is one of their many tactics), then I realized, it’s because of Monsanto’s role in Geoengineering.  If we take a retrospective, and do some research, History.com (agent orange and the Vietnam war), we will find that chemical giants, Monsanto & Dow created Agent Orange the infamous neurotoxic defoliant that was sprayed “chemtrail” style in the Vietnam war, the devastating effects of which continues to poison Vietnam, and plague veterans to this day.  Isn’t it highly suspicious that Bill Gates and Monsanto are openly involved in climate science under the guise of “protecting” the earth? For instance, check out this Science Magazine article from January 26, 2010; of course, there is no admission of funding climate engineering field experiments, but since when does mainstream media report anything other than what they are PAID to say?  http://news.sciencemag.org/2010/01/bill-gates-funding-geoengineering-research

It is undeniable that Monsanto’s unsustainable, biohazardous agricultural practices have contributed largely to polluting the atmosphere of this once pristine planet, manipulating and destroying nature, despite what their public relations spin doctors claim.  Yet now, under the guise of “helping” the climate, (which was purposely constructed to be a controversial and volatile political debate designed to be advantageous to these profiteers of Geoengineering and genetic engineering), they will be able to make, sell, and dump more chemicals into our atmosphere, and increase their “bottom line” while jeopardizing our health and environment.

Not to mention the underground seed vault.  This article is from 2007, but was not reported in mainstream news, and I only recently discovered this:  “Doomsday Seed Vault” in the Arctic.  Click this link for Photos.  Haven’t the profiteers of resource exploitation done enough to poison us and our planet?  We must ask ourselves, if “chemtrails” aren’t real, then why is there an underground vault, and why has the biotech industry spent the past few years developing this?… US Patent # 7,582,809. Sorghum Aluminum Tolerance Gene

Have you noticed that “chemtrails” has become a trigger word to conjure up images of “crazy conspiracy theories”?  If anyone does a search online for more information about chemtrails, everything that comes up at first is about “debunking chemtrails” or “conspiracy theories”, and is NOT even remotely valid research data! These so called “debunkers”  have no merit whatsoever, which becomes obvious when you take a close look and do further research.  Both of the debunked “debunking” sites that the  shills attempt to direct people to, “contrailsxience” and “metabuxk”, are disinformation sites both ran by the same guy, a gaming programmer with no expertise or education in science, meteorology, or anything else relevant to Geoengineering.  That’s why verifiable information is critical. Hardcore deniers that demand “scientific evidence” as to the validity of large scale Geoengineering, need only watch this Science Channel Documentary:

Additionally, there is a comprehensive presentation by doctoral researcher in the UK, David Lim, that uncovers the truth behind those disinformation tactics by providing irrefutable facts and scientific data about the reality of Geoengineering, (the intense spraying of heavy metals into our skies for the purpose of weather & climate control):

Never stop questioning everything you hear or read!  Always do YOUR OWN research and look beyond the surface to see through the “spin”, just like how GMOs fail to yield more or contribute to humanity, because they’re designed for profit, not “feed the world”.  Reality directly conflicts with Monsanto’s egregious public relations claims, therefore, it is important to not listen to their PR nonsense, but instead, pay attention to their actions, and trust your instincts.  Listen to your heart and be aware of their Public Relations Spin such as what they used when Monsanto bought Beeologics in September 2011, under the guise of “helping save the pollinators”.  Hm? Would these be the same pollinators that they are destroying with their toxic farming methods?

We have a duty to protect our health and our planet from corporate “biotech”, geoengineers, and the destructive bullies they have recruited to do their internet “dirty work”, otherwise, by the time they’re done, the planet will be nothing more than an uninhabitable toxic wasteland.

Please help spread the word to your friends, family, neighbors, coworkers, and everyone you meet, to enlighten people to the corporate disinformation tactics running rampant in our mainstream media & internet. Counter the disinformation by increasing awareness about GMOs, Geoengineering, and all issues that are adversely affecting our health and planet.  We must not let ourselves get caught up in the political hype that is intentionally constructed to keep us separated and distracted.  Isn’t it time we work together to put a stop to the “profit over people” mentality that is destroying our world?

The only thing that can stop the profiteers of poison is PUBLIC OUTCRY and that is exactly why disinformation is so rampant in the mainstream!  Please click the links below for more information, and share widely because we are all on this planet together…

~Rebel Siren

Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths, and Sadists – Psychology Today

Source: Disinformation: How It Works

Straw Man Manipulation Tactics

Confessions of a former “shill”: PAID INTERNET TROLLS

Outline of the most used troll strategies, become familiar with these methods in order to effectively expose them on public threads:

Disinformation Tactics of shills & online trolls

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/subcultures/trolling

John Massaria, Video Producer: Shills, Bullies, and disinformation – Global Skywatch

Do GMO Crops Really Have Higher Yields? | MoJo

Coalition Against Geoengineering

GlobalSkywatch.com/links

Photo Credit (top of page):  Internet Trolls, Cyberbullies, and Provocateurs – ipredator.com

“Why In The World Are They Spraying”: