The key to awareness is to lift the lid on the mainstream “box” and expand consciousness rising above the many petty distractions that inundate our lives.
The powers-that-be suppress awareness as a tool of oppression, to strip us of our freedom, liberty, dignity; to monetize, control, and manipulate us; keeping us disconnected from nature, each other, and ourselves, all the while exploiting us and our planet at the expense of our collective health and future sustainability.
What can we do? We CAN free our minds, find clarity and take responsibility for ourselves and our planet, and stand strong to defend & protect humanity and nature that sustains us.
If people dare to look beyond mortal exteriors of messengers to hear what they’re saying, rather than judging others according to “society’s standards”, truth can be heard.
Self, separatism, fear, are components of ego… We must all seek to rise above the limitations and suppression of this mortal realm, rising beyond ego and the fear “ego” begets, and instead, move towards truth, light, love; HUMANITY… where we are one.
This video offers extensive information to research and connections that mainstream media neglected to tell us about.
The video below is Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
Question everything, always do your own research, never believe the mainstream “spin”, they say what they are told to say by their corporate owners. Keep looking outside the mainstream, such as these two informative videos, to find real perspectives, questions, and answers, you will not find on Fox “News” or other status quo mainstream media outlets.
Dynamic Aviation(aerial spraying, one of many aviation companies that perform aerial spraying services and with the following list of customers, it’s unlikely that they spray only pesticide). Its Customers:
NCAR/UCAR EOL“Development, Deployment, Data, Discovery –Research Aviation Facilityhas been in operation since 1967, serving the NSF geosciences community by providing research platforms and expertise in airborne installations and measurement techniques”: https://www.eol.ucar.edu/about/our-organization/raf
NCAR/UCAR EOL – PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE – Quote: “Are you thinking about a field study in a remote part of the world that requires international agreements and clearances? Are you a researcher who has a great scientific idea but little experience in planning and implementing a multi-agency, multi-facility and multi-scientist campaign? Are you overwhelmed by the prospect of having to make logistics arrangements for a “measurement super site” in a location where little to no infrastructure exists?“. For more info on EOL “field projects”: https://www.eol.ucar.edu/field-projects
Edgewood/Aberdeen Army Experiments on Military Personnel:
From 1955 to 1975, the U.S. Army Chemical Corps conducted classified medical studies at Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland. The purpose was to evaluate the impact of low-dose chemical warfare agents on military personnel and to test protective clothing and pharmaceuticals.” — (see link below for more)
The moment 18-year-old Army Pvt. Tim Josephs arrived at Edgewood Arsenal in 1968, he knew there was something different about the place.
“It just did not look like a military base, more like a hospital,” recalled Josephs, a Pittsburgh native. Josephs had volunteered for a two-month assignment at Edgewood, in Maryland, lured by three-day weekends closer to home.
“It was like a plum assignment,” Josephs said. “The idea was they would test new Army field jackets, clothing, weapons and things of that nature, but no mention of drugs or chemicals.”
But when he went to fill out paperwork the morning after his arrival, the base personnel were wearing white lab coats, and Josephs said he had second thoughts. An officer took him aside.
“He said, ‘You volunteered for this. You’re going to do it. If you don’t, you’re going to jail. You’re going to Vietnam either way — before or after,'” Josephs said recently.
From 1955 to 1975, military researchers at Edgewood were using not only animals but human subjects to test a witches’ brew of drugs and chemicals. They ranged from potentially lethal nerve gases like VX and sarin to incapacitating agents like BZ. – CNN (Source link below).
In the continuing series of articles exposing trolls/shills/cyberbullies, introducing activist Madison Star Moon’s mini-doc appropriately titled, “Trolls Gone Wild”. Well done, Madison Star Moon!
If WE (all people of the world) care about the future sustainability of this planet and all life on it, then we absolutely MUST wake up to global climate engineering and recognize it as the polluting REALITY that it IS.
There are four honest mentalities regarding geoengineering:
1) AGAINST(activists who CARE about life-nature-planet-future)
2) FOR(“debunkers” & the corp/gov/biotech/geoengineering/dirty energy profiteers funding them)
3) APATHETIC(too self centered to notice or care either way)
4) STATUS QUO(the masses of groupthink/herd mentality duped by the disinformation campaign remaining in a vehement state of denial unwittingly doing its bidding).
If we question WHY disinformation is so rampant in social media, targeting those increasing awareness attempting to assassinate their character to discredit their efforts, the answer is clear, it’s a strategic attack to purposely suppress awareness and prevent outcry because “an ignorant public is a compliant public”.
Visit our other articles about social media trolls to learn more:
PROPAGANDA: prop•a•gan•da, präpəˈgandə/noun 1. derogatory information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view; “he was charged with distributing enemy propaganda”. Synonyms: information, promotion, advertising, publicity, spin; disinformation, counter-information; historical agitprop; informal info, hype, plugging; puff piece; the big lie “the prophetic novel is about a government that controls the masses by spreading propaganda”; the dissemination of propaganda as a political strategy: “the party’s leaders believed that a long period of education and propaganda would be necessary”.
Hook, Line, & STINKER – Can You Smell The Disinformation Bait?
Climate Engineering, weather modification and weather warfare is more of a reality than you may think. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that the profiteers of such programs would spend big money and go to great lengths to keep the public in the dark by way of propaganda to prevent public outcry that would be the only thing to have the power to put an end to their profitable but destructive programs. That said, is anyone else suspicious of the viral video, “BUSTED Pilot Forgets To Turn Off Chemtrails While Landing” below? Or am I the only one that smells the disinformation bait?
Whether the video of the “busted pilot forgetting to turn off chemtrails while landing” is real or not is irrelevant since it clearly has been used as a setup for a “debunking” attack. Considering that the disinformation campaign has successfully turned the word “chemtrails” into a trigger word, labeling anyone who questions the official narrative a “conspiracy theorist“, purposely associating such a label with Bigfoot, aliens, “moon hoax”, etc., these notorious “debunkers”, (disinformation shills associated with the two notorious junk sites ran by gaming programmer, Mick West), seemed to have “debunked” the video before it even came out, and that smells fishy. See excerpt below and click orange link for full article about how the CIA coined the term “conspiracy theorist” to control mass perception:
Specifically, in April 1967, the CIA wrote a dispatch which coined the term “conspiracy theories” … and recommended methods for discrediting such theories. The dispatch was marked “psych” – short for “psychological operations” (a.k.a. psyops) or disinformation – and “CS” for the CIA’s “Clandestine Services” unit. The dispatch was produced in responses to a Freedom of Information Act request by the New York Times in 1976.
The dispatch states:
2. This trend of opinion is a matter of concern to the U.S. government, including our organization.
The aim of this dispatch is to provide material countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries. Background information is supplied in a classified section and in a number of unclassified attachments.
3. Action. We do not recommend that discussion of the [conspiracy] question be initiated where it is not already taking place. Where discussion is active addresses are requested:
a. To discuss the publicity problem with and friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors) , pointing out that the [official investigation of the relevant event] made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, that the charges of the critics are without serious foundation, and that further speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the opposition. Point out also that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately generated by … propagandists. Urge them to use their influence to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation.
b. To employ propaganda assets to and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this guidance should provide useful background material for passing to assets. Our ploy should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (I) wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (II) politically interested, (III) financially interested, (IV) hasty and inaccurate in their research, or (V) infatuated with their own theories.
4. In private to media discussions not directed at any particular writer, or in attacking publications which may be yet forthcoming, the following arguments should be useful:
a. No significant new evidence has emerged which the Commission did not consider.
b. Critics usually overvalue particular items and ignore others. They tend to place more emphasis on the recollections of individual witnesses (which are less reliable and more divergent–and hence offer more hand-holds for criticism) …
c. Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal in the United States, esp. since informants could expect to receive large royalties, etc.
d. Critics have often been enticed by a form of intellectual pride: they light on some theory and fall in love with it; they also scoff at the Commission because it did not always answer every question with a flat decision one way or the other.
f. As to charges that the Commission’s report was a rush job, it emerged three months after the deadline originally set. But to the degree that the Commission tried to speed up its reporting, this was largely due to the pressure of irresponsible speculation already appearing, in some cases coming from the same critics who, refusing to admit their errors, are now putting out new criticisms.
g. Such vague accusations as that “more than ten people have died mysteriously” can always be explained in some natural way ….
5. Where possible, counter speculation by encouraging reference to the Commission’s Report itself. Open-minded foreign readers should still be impressed by the care, thoroughness, objectivity and speed with which the Commission worked. Reviewers of other books might be encouraged to add to their account the idea that, checking back with the report itself, they found it far superior to the work of its critics.
Given this, is it really so far fetched to consider this ploy is being utilized to this day by profiteers of climate engineering and other potentially disastrous profit above people programs to prevent public outcry?…
In the video of the “busted pilot”, it does appear that spray nozzles may be in full operation as the plane descends, (could be chemical spray, jet fuel dump, or a good Photoshop job), either way, the swirly mini-tornadoes that appear is a scientific phenomenon called, “Wake Vortex”, making over-zealous activists an easy target for the “debunkers”. This is the focus of the “debunkers”, of course, and there are countless webpages of disinformation sites “proving” this. Newsflash, “debunkers”. It is important to remember how disinformation works, it’s an intentional concoction of truth & lies constructed to manipulate and deceive an honest public, negatively influence opinion, suppress awareness and ultimately prevent outcry, because they know that “an ignorant public is a compliant public“.
This video is sourceless and virtually unverifiable, making it a prime target for a “debunking” ploy. Perhaps it’s real, perhaps it isn’t, the fact is that we’ll never know. It is entirely plausible that the “debunkers” planted it themselves as an attempt to appear credible while making those sharing it look gullible & foolish, with the ultimate goal of discrediting the entire movement; a well known political disinformation tactic. Indisputably, shills get recruited to infiltrate social media for these kinds of purposes:Definition of an internet shill
Climate engineering field experiments are not only possible, but probable, when we dig beyond the mainstream disinformation.
For example, this is the site photo of the scientific research company, Novim, contracted by a team of geoengineers, including Ken Caldeira and David Keith, in 2009 to do a decade long agenda of climate engineering “research” including field experiments: http://www.novim.org/projects/climate-engineering Doesn’t this photo look amazingly like the heavy persistent streaks we often observe in our sky? Novim entitled their photo, “comtrails”, their technical term for chemical-contrails so as not be confused with “chemtrails”, a trigger word used in the mainstream, previously referenced as exotic weapons in Bill HR2977 introduced by Senator Dennis Kucinich, October 2, 2001, (B)-(ii):Bill H.R.2977 HR107th Congress (2001-2002)
Let’s use our critical thinking skills and ask ourselves, since Novim, (along with other research companies), have been researching climate engineering including field experiments for the past five years during their ten year agenda that began in 2009, isn’t it possible that the heavy persistent streaks we often observe in our global skies are indeed the result of climate engineering field experiments, and that “denial” is a tactic used by the “debunkers”, (shills), in the mainstream to convince the public it isn’t happening in order to keep it covert and prevent public outcry?
Because, in all the “debating & denial”, there has been no mention of how science actually works, (other than generic inapplicable text-speak on how water vapor contrails are formed). In science, a hypothesis is formed and experimentation follows. Therefore, it stands to reason that geoengineers wouldn’t submit their ideas for implementation, as they continue to openly do, unless they have first tested them. Watch the clip of Geoengineer David Keith on Colbert Nation where he admits his solution is to dump 20,000 tons of SULPHURIC ACID into the stratosphere:Geoengineer David Keith on Colbert Nation
The disinformation shills’ (“debunkers”) logic is deeply flawed and their outlandish demand for unattainable “proof” is a tactic used to distract and create doubt. Anyone that has taken basic science in school understands that field experiments are an integral part of any scientific endeavor. Scientific Method. Notice in this basic science flowchart that experimentation happens TWICE in order for the conclusion “final statement” to be reached.
However, according to the “chemtrail debunkers“, geoengineers do not follow the basic rules of science and are not now, nor have they ever been, performing any experimentation whatsoever, haha.
Why waste time on the mainstream pseudoscience junk sites ran by a gamer that fancies himself a “debunker”, when we can bypass the mainstream hype and through scholar searches find credible sites such as, “Integrated Assessment of Geoengineering Proposals”, and ask ourselves, would they really put this much time and effort into something that hasn’t already been field tested to some degree? Integrated Assessment of Geoengineering Proposals Research: http://www.iagp.ac.uk/iagp-research
Take time to watch the NASA Von Karman Lecture with Riley Duren, Principal Engineer and Chief Systems Engineer for the Earth Science Directorate at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. entitled, “Geoengineering and Climate Intervention – What We Need To Know“, he explains geoengineering in understandable terms, and at one point, states that anyone can perform field experiments if they have the motivation and the resources. Given this information, it’s entirely possible that global climate engineering experiments have indeed been occurring insidiously, adversely, affecting our health and environment. Denial of the “possibility”, is either the highest form of ignorance, or intentional deceit to dupe an honest public.
Videos such as the ‘pilot/chemtrail’ that suddenly go viral and immediately get “debunked” are often intentionally planted to discredit the awareness movement. To avoid this trap, stick to solid, reputable information such as the links provided in this post.
If you’re going to share links on social media, trust your own videos & photos or ones whose source you can verify. Please be wary of suddenly viral stuff floating around on the internet with no references or traceable location, including memes, photos, and videos. Do not be so quick to share them, because it isn’t helping increase awareness if it ultimately discredits us.
Regardless of whether that video is really of a pilot that “forgot to turn off his chemical spray nozzles”, a normal jet fuel landing dump, or a disinformation plant that’s been Photoshopped, the fact remains climate engineering experiments are happening and plenty of solid information backs it up. It doesn’t take an expert in aviation or atmospheric science to look up and notice the abnormal crisscrossing persistent contrails lingering in the sky, whitening it and blocking the sun.
Believe your own eyes, trust yourself, and refuse to fall for the mainstream peer pressure of the “denier” herd mentality due to the rampant PROPAGANDA that has infiltrated our social media, because that’s what they are counting on.
Primary definition of the word, “propaganda“: prop•a•gan•da, präpəˈgandə/noun 1. derogatory information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view; “he was charged with distributing enemy propaganda”. Synonyms: information, promotion, advertising, publicity, spin; disinformation, counter-information; historical agitprop; informal info, hype, plugging; puff piece; the big lie “the prophetic novel is about a government that controls the masses by spreading propaganda”; the dissemination of propaganda as a political strategy: “the party’s leaders believed that a long period of education and propaganda would be necessary”.
This is the NASA Von Karman Lecture with Riley Duren, Principal Engineer and Chief Systems Engineer for the Earth Science Directorate at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, entitled, “Geoengineering and Climate Intervention – What We Need To Know”. This is an irrefutable source of credible scientific information related to geoengineering and climate change. Why waste time on those “debunking” pseudo-science sites prevalent in our mainstream, when we can bypass all of that and get real information?
Duren states within the video that anyone, (any entity), can perform field experiments if they have the motivation and the resources. Doesn’t that spark curiosity about the possibility that global aerial spraying could already be occurring, either as field experimentation or outright underground programs funded by dirty energy to get the climate under control in order to thwart clean energy and keep on polluting? Well, if we take the time to watch, listen, and research this information presented by NASA, the “possibility” becomes crystal clear and suddenly the “denial” is exposed as either pure ignorance or a ploy to deter public outcry, or BOTH. We are smarter than than, aren’t we?
Rosalind Peterson was a Keynote Speaker at the 60th Annual United Nations DPI/NGO Conference on Climate Change (New York on September 5-7, 2007). She spoke about the negative impacts of experimental weather modification and climate engineering programs on agriculture, along with other issues directly related to the survival and sustainability of the planet.
Since the conference, Rosalind Peterson continues to present her United Nations PowerPoint Presentation to colleges, universities and interested groups in an effort to continue raising awareness of this crucial issue, and has subsequently become a target of the disinformation trolls, along with other leaders of the movement to inform the public of these hazardous covert weather & climate manipulation programs.
In 1995, Rosalind Peterson became a certified United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Farm Service Agency Agriculture Crop Loss Adjuster and worked in more than ten counties throughout California. Crop losses can be attributed to weather related causes and that is her area of expertise. Prior to her career with the USDA, she worked for five years for the Mendocino County Department of Agriculture as an Agriculture Technologist.
Rosalind Peterson holds a BA degree from Sonoma State University in Environmental Studies & Planning (1991 ENSP), with emphasis on solar power, photosynthesis, agriculture, crop production, and the efficient use of energy in the future. She has won several awards and recognition for her extensive efforts to protect drinking water supplies in Martinez, California, from toxic chemical contamination. She also writes articles on many issues, including protection of the environment from ongoing, unregulated, atmospheric geoengineering (climate engineering) experiments and weather modification programs.