The key to unlocking awareness is to lift the lid on your mainstream “box” and expand your consciousness. The powers that be use awareness suppression as a tool of oppression, to strip us of our freedom, liberty, and dignity; to monetize us, to control us and manipulate us and our planet at the expense of our health and future sustainability. What can we do? We CAN free our minds, gain clarity, strength of mind, and take responsibility.
WHO IS BEHIND THE CURTAIN OF WW101?
Pulling back the curtain to reveal the “wizard” behind Weatherwar 101 and his “Straw Man” attacks, it’s no surprise that we find a frail, vindictive little man, doing his best to conceal his true identity while attacking and harassing others from the shadows, using a small army of angry accomplices, most of whom feel ignored or slighted by those they target and attack. Introducing Davoud Tohidy of Ottawa, Canada.
Could Davoud Tohidy, “Weatherwar 101”, be a more vicious version of Mick West? And, if so, WHO is behind Tohidy? Help us examine all the PUBLIC information presented that is available to anyone with the internet, and you decide. One thing is clear, Davoud Tohidy is out to get activists leading the awareness movement by lumping them in the same category of all the other Cult Trolls/Deniers/Shills, what could his motive be, and, who does he work for?
Connecting The Dots
According to what we’ve dug up in PUBLIC searches that anyone can do, we have found that Tohidy fits the profile of a classic climate science denier/harasser/cyber-stalker. Coincidentally, dirty energy (big oil, coal, etc.) has an interest in denial too; they have been simultaneously denying while supporting, climate science, and have a few climate engineering projects of their own. BP is first on the list on ETC Group GeoMap performing CDR (carbon dioxide removal). Ironic that BP is a climate denier, yet performs their own “carbon dioxide removal”, hm? Duplicity in the crude world is a huge problem, see: BP – Deceiving The Public About Geo Engineering | Rebel Siren. But, first, let’s take a look at the climate denial harassment and cyberstalking occurring in recent years as scientific findings surface that counteract the “denial”.
CLIMATE SCIENTISTS FACE HARASSMENT IN THE US
InsideClimateNews.org — The harassment faced by U.S.-based climate scientists has been well documented in the media—but not the harassment of scientists in Europe, Canada or the rest of the world.
That’s because there hasn’t been much to report.
While outspoken scientists of human-caused climate change in the United States endure torrents of freedom of information requests, hate mail and even death threats from skeptics, their counterparts abroad have been free to do their work without fear.
Davoud Tohidy has been circulating a petition supposedly signed by thousands of scientists against climate science calling it a “HOAX”. What’s up with that? This smells fishy, reminiscent of Disinformation Bait, in fact, the entire “climate war” smells fishy, as intentional political obfuscation often does.
Davoud Tohidy a.k.a. WW101 continues to solicit money from well meaning activists globally for a supposed lawsuit he is doing in Canada. At first glance, a lawsuit to expose and stop “chemtrails” seems like a great idea, a giant leap forward, however, when you stop and connect the dots to what is really going on, it becomes clear that all he’s really doing is confirming the “conspiracy theory” angle, detrimental to the cause by making activists look like a bunch of “tin-foil hat wearing, paranoid, conspiracy theorists“, a disinformation tactic used in the mainstream to discredit people and minimize their efforts to raise awareness.
Notice how Davoud Tohidy exploits the “conspiracy” angle on his affidavit in the screenshot below, that is of public record and available to anyone.
Let’s take a look at some other notorious “climate deniers” double dipping and exploiting the situation for their own gain, and examine the similarities:
THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE EXPOSED BY YALE CLIMATE CONNECTIONS AS DIRTY ENERGY SHILLS AND PROMOTING GEOENGINEERING AS SOLUTION TO A PROBLEM THAT THEY DENY IS EVEN HAPPENING – http://rebelsiren.wordpress.com/2014/09/07/the-heartland-institue-of-chicago-exposed-by-yale-university/ The following link is THE HEARTLAND’S propagandized spin an intentional blow in the war on awareness, that they are perpetuating, ironically calling it a “war on science”: http://blog.heartland.org/2014/07/whos-really-waging-the-war-on-science/
Scientist Michael Mann attacked for his post doctoral research findings in proving anthropogenic causes of climate heating: https://www.facebook.com/MichaelMannScientist/posts/328603620529180 According to our research, Michael Mann’s findings indicating anthropogenic climate change has made him a target in the “Climate War”. We would like to formally state that as an unbiased observer and sharer of truth, we are not taking sides in the “climate war“, only helping connect the dots by pointing out the rampant cyber-stalking, corporate disinformation, and rampant agitation-propagandist attacks, the dissemination, obscurity, and intentional obfuscation in the mainstream. We are merely sharing information to establish connections and help others unveil the truth. Disinformation is a balanced mixture of truth & lies, otherwise, it wouldn’t be such an effective tool of awareness suppression.
More about the attacks on Michael Mann to show the “climate war” in full throttle: http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/24085 And: http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-06/battle-over-climate-change
There is even a Climate Science Legal Defense Fund: http://climatesciencedefensefund.org/
Establishing the connection between Davoud Tohidy to Climate Science DENIAL & CYBER-STALKING:
In doing a perfunctory LEGAL and PUBLIC online search as in the previous screenshots, it turns out that Davoud Tohidy is indeed a vehement climate science denier, harasser of climate scientists, harasser of geoengineering awareness activists performing climate engineering research/sharing their findings, and basically everyone that dare “disagree” with him, or at least disagrees with his alias, WW101. Tohidy has been revealed promoting the “petition” by so called scientists against climate science, calling global warming a “hoax”, whose signatures are yet to be verified as being “legitimate”. Again, we have peeled back the curtain to reveal the frail, angry little wizard behind the WW101 curtain pushing “weather modification”, and “chemtrails” as a “conspiracy theory”, dismissing climate science and climate engineering. Why? What’s his motive? After connecting the dots, we have to wonder if Davoud Tohidy is a disinformation agent, a more vicious version of Mick West? According to Tohidy’s PUBLIC LinkedIn page, they do have a lot in common: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davoudtohidy This is not an “accusation”, it is an examination, a questioning.
For instance, let’s examine how Davoud Tohidy reverse accuses others of being “psyops”, yet he clearly uses psyop tactics of an agitation-propaganda nature; reverse accusation, character assassination, straw man, playing on people’s emotion and insecurity, etc., doing all of this while hiding behind his anonymous identity Weatherwar 101, simultaneously accusing others of using anonymous accounts on social media for sinister purposes, the very thing we have found that he, himself, is guilty of, while promoting this petition that clearly falls into the category of cyber-stalking with the intent to HARASS real climate scientists and discredit their valuable work. Below is the “petition” he continually promotes all over social media, a cut and dry case of CLIMATE DENIAL / CYBER-STALKING. We wonder if these signatures are even legitimate and verifiable? Even if they are, it’s just more status quo denial perpetrated to suppress awareness in order for industrial polluters to keep on polluting at the expense of our health and atmosphere to shift responsibility and further cloud information in the mainstream, confuse the public, and dupe well meaning activists. http://www.petitionproject.org/
Apparently, Davoud Tohidy a.k.a. WW101 is aware that cyber-stalking is a prosecutable offense and in some cases, a felony, and that’s why he uses the “straw man” reverse accusation tactic against others in an attempt to deflect focus from his rampant criminal activity on social media: http://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9.61.260
Following the video is a screenshot of the comment Davoud Tohidy made as Weatherwar 101, which is blatant harassment and cyber-stalking of GeoengineeringWatch.org founder, Dane Wigington, using Kim Moore a.k.a. Guerrera Zorra (youtube), @TerminatorBarbi (Twitter), “truth slayer” (she “slays” the truth?), to extend the attacks. Kim Moore is the woman that couldn’t control her outbursts to the Board of Supervisors Hearing in Shasta County on July 15th, discrediting the movement with her inappropriate behavior, our sources report. Was her behavior an intentional act to discredit the movement or was she simply overcome with emotion? At this point, either scenario is possible as she has since jumped on Tohidy’s WW101 bandwagon to target and attack the founder of GeoengineeringWatch.org. Our sources reveal that at the hearing after Kim Moore’s outbursts frustrated the board into a 20 minute recess, Mr. Wigington suggested to her that she wasn’t helping the cause and to shut up. Now, Kim Moore seems to be hell bent on revenge, rather than admit she should have exercised restraint at the hearing. Apparently, she is the only one allowed to be emotional and reactionary. This is a woman clearly driven by narcissism (ego) and negativity (anger, revenge), rather than a sense of humanity and acting for the greater good. We were curious what really happened at the Shasta County Hearing, so we found out. If you pay attention to this video at the 11:08, 11:33, 15:33, 16:02 marks, you will hear Kim Moore’s outbursts for yourself:
The screenshot below is also a PUBLIC “commendation” by Weatherwar 101, Davoud Tohidy and accomplices, to praise Kim Moore for her assistance in underhandedly tricking filmmaker Michael Murphy by recording a conversation with him, without his knowledge, then posting it on youtube as WW101 accusing the GeoengineeringWatch.org founder of being a “psyop”,and angrily accusing activists of using “anonymous accounts” to “harass” him. Some nerve Tohidy‘s got, the irony.
The only thing truthful in the above statement by Davoud Tohidy a.k.a. WW101, is that he knows a lot about terrorism considering that he routinely employs cyber-stalking / disinformation tactics against geoengineering activists that he is unable to recruit. This is not an “accusation”, we are merely pointing out what we have found through basic PUBLIC searches and that sources have confirmed.
For instance, let’s examine in closer detail, the allegations made by Tohidy in reference to the video presentation, “Is Climate Engineering Decimating Our Weather?”, as per the screenshot below:
If we take the time to pay attention to detail, we find that in his accusations, Davoud Tohidy a.k.a. WW101, fails to present the video he references in his attack on the Geoengineering Watch founder, yet sought out and highlights a miniscule comment at the very end of the video presentation completely irrelevant to the information being presented. That is a version of the classic “Straw Man” tactic. A Straw Man is an informal fallacy based on the misrepresentation of an opponent’s statement or stance. A “Straw Man” attack, to be successful, requires that the audience be ignorant or uninformed about the actual facts. The goal of the “Straw Man” attack in this case, is clearly to damage the reputation of the founder of GeoengineeringWatch.org discrediting him, (“character assassination”), as well as gain Michael Murphy publicity for marketing purposes, (we’ve heard through the grapevine that WW101 plans to make a “film”), albeit negative; but, according to Hollywood, “there’s no such thing as bad press”, right?
Out of the entire video presentation of information and research material presented in “Is Climate Engineering Decimating Our Weather”, Tohidy meticulously picks out one irrelevant, honest remark at the very end of it in the Q&A portion, to detract from the information presented. A remark that no one else noticed, much less focused on, or judged, previous to the attacks of Tohidy masquerading as WW101. The removal of context and using that type of “Straw Man” tactic to slander others to discredit them is the strategy of a disinformation agent, a traitor to humanity. No accusation is being made against Davoud Tohidy in this post, we are merely pointing out the discrepancies of his accusations, the tactics he is using, his connection to WW101, and questioning his motives, as the public should do in an effort to sift through the continuing haze of mainstream disinformation clouding the truth. We encourage you to research for yourself and draw your own conclusions, but we do advise against jumping on the Weatherwar 101 bandwagon that is proving itself to be nothing but a mixture of truth & lies to dupe honest activists.
The tactics used by Tohidy conjunctively also works to “incite violence”, by antagonizing and inflaming others’ sense of outrage, at the expense of Michael Murphy’s reputation, which DAVOUD TOHIDY has damaged in his mission to discredit others, as becomes very clear when we explore the presentation Tohidy has attacked, and research the history of Tohidy’s climate science denial/cyber-stalking.
Anyone that takes the time to watch the video presentation start to finish and pays attention, will notice that the remark was at the end of it and obviously wasn’t a judgment, “insult”, nor meant to be “slanderous”; it was an honest response to a question raised by an audience member. Perhaps the presenter could have come up with some bogus response that could be deemed somehow “more appropriate”, however, if you take the time to watch the video, it is clear that he was merely honestly answering a question about whether, “Who In The World Is Spraying” is in production.
The one who has worked to damage Michael Murphy’s reputation is Davoud Tohidy a.k.a. WW101 by highlighting Murphy’s substance abuse problem for the purpose of discrediting another, and gaining publicity all at the same time. Wow, evil genius. Impressive.
We live in a chaotic world, people sometimes use different means of escape, no one should judge Michael Murphy, but have compassionate hearts, not USE HIM like Davoud Tohidy and his angry accomplices have done to suit their own agenda.
Davoud Tohidy’s accusations are entirely baseless and meant to be purely inflammatory for the purpose of “character assassination” once we take the time to examine the video presentation, “Is Climate Engineering Decimating Our Weather”, for ourselves, and the CONTEXT in which the remark he is attacking, was made.
According to the comment below by one of Weatherwar 101’s followers, apparently, not buying into the whole “orgonite defeats chemtrails” thing, is a sign of a “psyop”. The purpose of this screenshot is to show the absurd mentality common among Tohidy’s followers.
Further, Tohidy is trying to shift blame and shun responsibility by attacking anyone and everyone that has tried to point out the truth, according to his continuing hostile comments on social media. It becomes very clear if you take the time to watch the presentation from the beginning and pay attention to the information being presented, then at the end during the Q&A portion at approximately the one hour mark, note the context of what was said as an explanation as to the reason the new WITWIS film production has been delayed. It’s obvious that it was not some “rehearsed” speech, nor was it an intentional “slandering” of Mr. Murphy, like what Davoud Tohidy is doing to others, using his anonymous WW101 identity. Are we the only ones that noticed this? Watch the entire presentation below and comment what your take on it is.
Take the time and do a cursory public search for yourself. The Rebel Siren Blog encourages everyone to always do their own research and draw their own conclusions. If you have facebook, check Davoud Tohidy’s activity on social media, “Weatherwar101″, “Canadian Geoengineering and Chemtrails Lawsuit” facebook page, etc. and you will see for yourself how the attacks and climate denial all tie in, and the hostility emanating from his “followers” in their often hostile comments defending his attacks.
Judging by Tohidy’s extensive computer programming qualifications, where would he find the time to go around attacking people on social media? Unless, of course, he is paid to do it, as well as recruiting an army of angry accomplices to unwittingly do his bidding, much like the debunking denier CULT.
Is it possible that Davoud Tohidy has targeted filmmaker Michael Murphy to not only be the “hapless victim”, but later the “triumphant filmmaker”, since Tohidy intends to make a film as WW101? Perhaps Tohidy is after publicity, as well as discredit leaders in the awareness movement? As we are learning, anything is possible.
Everything we have posted in this article, ALL images, screenshots, and information, is PUBLIC, therefore, LEGAL to share. Everything on the Rebel Siren Blog is FREE, 100% sharable, nothing is copyrighted, and everything is accessible to everyone around the globe. WW101 (Davoud Tohidy), charges $4.99 for an “e-book” and constantly solicits funds for his “conspiracy theory” lawsuit that will surely DAMAGE THE REAL MOVEMENT, with continual use of “disclaimers” and “copyright” notices, threatening everyone that may want to share information or that dare disagree with him. See for yourself that everything on Tohidy’s websites/pages is hostile, antagonistic, subversive/anonymous, and threatening in nature, rather than that of collective unity for the greater good and finding common ground to unite and stop the aerial assault in our skies.
Beware the innocuous appearance of Davoud Tohidy’s PUBLIC facebook “friend” profile, he most certainly has been hiding a lot from the public eye. Isn’t it bad enough that sincere activists must battle obvious troll/shills? Add to that, getting attacked by those masquerading as allies, makes it that much more difficult to sift through the haze of obscurity and uncover the truth. Often, the attacks are an intentional disinformation ploy to keep people busy defending themselves to detract focus, as well as turn the public against them (“character assassination”), judging by all the public information and connecting the dots, that certainly is plausible in the case of Davoud Tohidy a.k.a. Weatherwar 101.
Again, the screenshot above of Tohidy’s PUBLIC facebook friend profile is legal as it is accessible to anyone. We are not “using it as our own”, therefore, it is NOT a “copyright” or “privacy” violation.
Below is an “open letter” to Davoud Tohidy, a collective, global effort to appeal to his sense of humanity (if he has the capacity).
OPEN LETTER TO DAVOUD TOHIDY FROM THE PEOPLE
Davoud Tohidy, this is an open formal request that you, and your accomplices, immediately cease and desist your character assassination attempts and revenge mission against every person you’ve attacked anonymously as WW101 with the intention to “discredit”, that are trying raise awareness about harmful aerial activities. Your attempt at using context removal and a mixture of truth & lies to slander others and skew facts is the strategy of a disinformation agent, a traitor of humanity. In addition, your attention seeking behavior is inappropriate, destructive, and counterproductive to our collective cause.
This isn’t your planet, it’s OUR planet, and you do NOT have the right to speak for the people or threaten to sue anyone and everyone that dares to question or disagree with you, accusing them of being a “psyop” by using the disinformation tactics of a psyop. You, Davoud Tohidy, are part of the PROBLEM, not the solution.
In your attempt to discredit others to make yourself seem “superior”, you reveal yourself to be untrustworthy, underhanded, duplicitous, and dangerously manipulative. You and your army of angry accomplices focus your energy negatively, attempting to damage the reputation of others rather than HELPING the cause. According to your own posts on social media, your primary focus, other than character assassination of others, is to “fundraise”, solicit money for your Canadian “chemtrails” lawsuit, that will surely never come to fruition, as well as for a film under your WW101 alias, that will not be based on the reality of climate engineering, but on your personal viewpoints that you are intent on “selling” to we, the public.
You’re a member of dozens of “We Are The Change” global groups, yet you primarily post fundraising solicitations, as simple google searches that anyone can do, reveals. You’re a member of few “chemtrail” groups, but you primarily post derogatory accusations against others whose groups you’ve gotten yourself banned from and hold a personal grudge against. Did you honestly believe people wouldn’t eventually put the pieces together and see through you? You accuse others of having “anonymous” accounts to use on social media, but that is exactly what YOU DO, as searches of your public activities reveal.
You have been careful to keep your name off of Weatherwar 101 as an obvious attempt to shift responsibility hoping no one figures out you are the one behind the attacks, to hold yourself free from accountability and liability for your devious and ill-intended actions. Your “disclaimer” is nothing but a bogus attempt at shifting responsibility for your unlawful actions and will not hold up in a court of law, if those you attack decide to bring charges of cyber-stalking and harassment against you, as well they should.
Regardless of what your motives are, whether you’re the psyop, or just an angry, narcissistic, vengeful, insecure person, “we the people” insist that you take the time to contemplate your actions and how your begging for money, spreading of negativity, hate-monging, and antagonism on social media are adversely affecting humanity by shifting focus from the cause, to a place of rage, obscurity, and doubt.
Your insistence that geoengineering groups exclusively use the word “chemtrails” is a glaring red flag as to your true intentions considering it’s a shill trigger word, as well as rigged to come up as a “conspiracy theory” in online searches, additionally, you contradict your own demands by using the word “geoengineering” whenever it suits your agenda for fundraising purposes.
You frequently display “disclaimers” and “copyright” notifications hoping no one will put the pieces together that you are behind all the attacks, in addition to neglecting to acknowledge that one of the biggest problems our world faces is the suppression, hoarding, dissemination, and selling of information, rather that freely sharing with anyone and everyone interested in learning the truth. Those you have attacked are honest about their identity, you, however, are subversive in attacking people under your anonymous identity, “Weatherwar 101″.
Everyone with clarity that’s not clouded by rage or a personal vendetta against those you attack, can see that all you’re doing is perpetrating blatant disinformation tactics such as antagonism, semantics & character assassination to further your own agenda, whether it’s because you’re the paid “psyop”, agitation-propagandist, sock puppet, or an insecure attention seeker ran by your ego instead of any sense of true humanity and in it for the donations you solicit (seeing others as your “competition”), or are on some corporate payroll, your tactics are transparent and your behavior on social media is UNACCEPTABLE and will NOT BE TOLERATED BY THE PEOPLE ANY LONGER.
Despite your extensive efforts to conceal your identity, you have revealed yourself as Weatherwar 101, the one behind the attack videos that you keep circulating to try to discredit leaders in the awareness movement. You, Davoud Tohidy, are guilty of being a duplicitous, deceiver with glaring traits of disinformation agent spewing a mixture of truth & lies, just enough truth to convince the gullible, just enough lies to derail awareness and damage the movement. You masquerade as an ally, but hide in the shadows cloaked in anonymity, viciously attacking from behind like only an enemy would do.
YOUR inflammatory perpetuation of the “debate” as to whether the aerial assault in our skies is solely weather modification, bio-weaponry, climate control, or whether global warming is a “hoax”, naturally occurring, or anthropogenic, is only adding to the intentional obfuscation in the mainstream; taking away from the fact that the atmosphere, (weather and climate), is being manipulated with toxic substances at the expense of OUR health and future sustainability of this planet and THAT should be OUR collective focus, not “who’s the smartest” or the “best researcher”, “or the most evil”.
Do we not all agree that aerial spraying is occurring? If so, the only focus we should have is taking appropriate channels to stop it, but that can only happen if we all stand together. Awareness is being suppressed to prevent public outcry, and you are only making things WORSE by further dividing our cause! If we cannot unite to protect life and this planet against the perpetual destruction, WE, as a species, DO NOT stand a chance.
Is it your arrogance and massive ego that is impeding your ability to cohesively participate to stop the crimes against humanity? Or, are you a willing accomplice to crimes against humanity, a “psyop” as you continually accuse others of being? Or, are just acting out of anger and desperation for attention? Are you unaware of the duplicity in dirty energy simultaneously supporting and denying climate change, intentionally clouding the issue to detract focus from reality? Are you taking the side of those whose bottom line is to profit at the expense of our health and future sustainability of this planet? What is YOUR motive? Ego? Money? Anger? Fame? Fortune? Regardless, we DEMAND that you STOP the character assassination tactics right NOW and issue a public apology to those you’ve targeted and abused. We are all on this planet together and must find common ground to help save it, or we simply don’t stand a chance, or is that what you’re truly after, causing upheaval and chaos?
Dismissing the efforts of others, overlooking their intentions, and sneakily working to discredit other people and their work, while accusing them of doing the very thing YOU ARE doing, ultimately discredits you. If it’s attention you seek, that’s the one thing you have succeeded in accomplishing. Congratulations, you’ve exposed your own self, and none of your inapplicable “disclaimers” will protect you in a court of law when you are indicted as an accomplice to crimes against humanity, slander, defamation of character, harassment, cyber-stalking, falsifying information, intentional obfuscation of data to conceal detrimental aerial activity, unlawful solicitation of funds, fraud, and anything else the prosecutors can add to the laundry list of infractions you are continuing to perpetrate, in the class action suit against you AND your willing accomplices.
EVERYBODY ON THE GLOBE THAT CARES ABOUT LIFE AND THE FUTURE SUSTAINABILITY OF THE PLANET WE SHARE.
Thank you, “everybody”. The Rebel Siren Blog seeks to expose corruption in our society and let the truth have a chance in this deceit dominated world we live in.
Taking the time to examine the facts, understand disinformation tactics, (character assassination, agitation-propaganda, straw man, etc.), and question motives, we find that Davoud Tohidy’s rampant attacks on social media may indeed fall into the category of intentional disinformation. But, whether it is or isn’t is of no real consequence as long as people of the world become aware of his underhanded tactics masquerading as WW101. Awareness is the key to uncovering the truth, that’s why the propaganda machine works so hard to keep awareness suppressed.
Davoud Tohidy’s motive becomes clearer when we begin to connect the dots. By reverse accusing, and using blatant character assassination tactics to discredit others while dismissing the time and effort they have put into raising awareness of climate engineering, calling them “psyop gatekeepers”, Davoud Tohidy is basically exposing himself as a possible psyop gatekeeper, is he not? He continues to solicit money and perpetuate climate denial while actively harassing and cyber-stalking others anonymously as WW101.
The purpose of the Rebel Siren Blog is to share information and stimulate questions beyond the mainstream hype, to expose corruption in our world that is hindering our ability to protect the sustainability of our planet and thrive, rather than turn our planet into an uninhabitable wasteland and extinct ourselves.
ATTENTION: Everything in this blog post is of PUBLIC record, and can be found by anyone with basic access to internet search engines and a facebook page. ALL photos, images, screenshots, and information is AVAILABLE PUBLICLY, therefore, NO copyright or privacy violations have occurred; furthermore, any claim that states otherwise will be recognized as a ploy to suppress awareness and will NOT be tolerated. If anyone mentioned in this blog claims “their privacy has been violated” and attempts legal recourse due to the fact that they are an overly litigious hostile little whiner, they will be counter-sued for harassment, fraud, and “cyberstalking” charges will be promptly brought up against THEM for the rampant attacks they have perpetrated on social media forums”.
PROPAGANDA formal definition:
1. derogatory information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view; “he was charged with distributing enemy propaganda“. Synonyms: information, promotion, advertising, spin, publicity; disinformation, counter-information; historical agitprop; informal info, hype, plugging; puff piece; the big lie “the prophetic novel is about a government that controls the masses by spreading propaganda”; the dissemination of propaganda as a political strategy: “the party’s leaders believed that a long period of education and propaganda would be necessary”.
For additional information about other professional disinformants, visit Disinformation Directory: http://disinformationdirectory.com/d/
The Heartland Institute of Chicago EXPOSED (along with others).
(previously published by Rebel Siren on Disinformation Directory 7/14).
“Strange Bedfellows? Climate Change Denial and Support for Geoengineering”
By David Appell
Original Article Published October 30, 2013:
Potential benefits of geoengineering, despite attendant risks, appeal to some interests showing little concern for the seriousness of the climate change issue generally. What goes here?
These days, an article headlined “Geo-Engineering Seen as a Practical, Cost-Effective Global Warming Strategy” would hardly be surprising.
But what is surprising is that the headline came from a group denying global warming exists: The Heartland Institute in Chicago.
Well-known for its aggressive contrarian position on manmade global warming, and widely lambasted for its “I still believe in Global Warming. Do you?” billboard featuring a picture of Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber, the Heartland Institute might seem unlikely to propose a solution to a problem it doubts exists. So why did the group run an article on geoengineering in the December 2007 issue of its newsletter Environment & Climate News?
Written by David Schnare, at the time an EPA staff scientist and now a director at the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy, in the Virginia suburbs of Washington, D.C., the article is based on testimony Schnare gave to the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works earlier that same year. Schnare mentions the ease, speed, and relative low cost of geoengineering schemes like injecting sunlight-reflecting aerosols into the stratosphere, called solar radiation management (SRM). In particular, Schnare in that article cited research by scientist Ken Caldeira* of Stanford University (and now also the Carnegie Institute) and concludes “reducing greenhouse gases will cost around 2 percent of the gross domestic product, while geo-engineering (by putting reflective aerosols into the upper atmosphere) will cost about one-thousandth of that.” Nobel Laureate Paul Crutzen’s 2006 article helped pave way for more serious consideration of geoengineering options.
But Schnare’s article, written just a year after Nobel Laureate Paul Crutzen’s seminal and controversial 2006 article calling for serious active research into solar radiation management, ignores the many complications, side effects, and unintended consequences of SRM that worry many. Crutzen had specifically mentioned undesirable destruction of protective stratospheric ozone. And SRM does nothing to stop ocean acidification, instead creating a world never before seen, high in carbon dioxide while relatively low in temperature.
Only in the last sentence of his article did Schnare casually advocate a vigorous development away from carbon-based energy sources, writing “the most sensible approach would be a mixed strategy of geo-engineering…and vigorously developing a transition from carbon-based energy, to include research on scrubbing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.”
Despite this article and others, and at least one presentation at its annual conferences, “Heartland doesn’t have a position on geoengineering,” according to Joseph Bast, the Institute’s president and CEO.
‘The Lomborg Maneuver’
The Heartland Institute is hardly alone in considering geoengineering as a solution to a problem it basically doesn’t see as a problem in the first place. Bjorn Lomborg and ‘Lomborg Maneuver’ — opposition to ‘real-world’ actions, but support for more radical approaches?
In recent years, Bjorn Lomborg has often downplayed the threats from climate change while pushing geoengineering as a short-term solution. So too have Newt Gingrich, the former EPA staff economist Alan Carlin, and the American Enterprise Institute, which earlier this year posted a seminar calling solar radiation management “an evolving climate policy option” on its website…a site chock-full of climate contrarianism.
One environmental group has taken to calling this straddle the “Lomborg maneuver” — “switching from opposing real-world action on climate change to supporting the most extreme possible action on climate change.”
How might one reconcile such seemingly contradictory positions? and why do they often come from politically conservative individuals and organizations? In his recent book, Earthmasters: The Dawn of the Age of Climate Engineering, Clive Hamilton argues that this pair of positions maintains the dominant power structures of society, especially the roles of the energy mega-corporations that have a great deal to lose from any shift away from fossil fuels.
Hamilton, a professor of public ethics at Charles Sturt University in Canberra, Australia, writes “…these results are consistent with the more general argument that conservatives tend to take a more hierarchical view of society, as a natural order in which some groups are dominant and some subservient. Like a patient who will accept the doctor’s diagnosis only if the illness is treatable, a solution to global warming that does not destabilize a person’s worldview — but in fact validates it — makes recognizing the problem palatable. As the identity of conservative white males tends to be more strongly bound to the prevailing social structure, geoengineering is the kind of solution to climate change that is less threatening to their values and sense of self they are consistent with the ideas of control over the environment and the personal liberties associated with free market capitalism. Just as the need to defend a cultural worldview makes conservative white males prone to repudiate climate science, so that worldview will make them prone to support geoengineering solutions”.–
Hamilton cites research by Dan Kahan of the Yale Law School and others showing that facts must accommodate one’s cultural values if they are to be accepted. Kahan calls this the cultural cognition thesis — that cognitively, cultural values come before facts in assessing many public risk conflicts, and to be accepted, facts must accommodate those values. Kahan concludes “as a result of a complex of interrelated psychological mechanisms, groups of individuals will credit and dismiss evidence of risk in patterns that reflect and reinforce their distinctive understandings of how society should be organized.” Australian professor Clive Hamilton sees geoengineering as less threatening to conservatives’ ‘values and sense of self.’
This thesis helps explain many of the current sharp divisions over public policies, especially those with scientific origins such as climate change, vaccinations, and genetically modified foods. Those with values that place more emphasis on the individual would be expected to dismiss environmental and technological risks if solving them requires restricting industry and commerce. Those who more highly value egalitarianism and community are generally suspicious of capitalism’s disparities and its emphasis on individual initiative, and they therefore are more likely to advocate top-down regulation of commercial activity.
In the context of climate change and geoengineering, Kahan and his colleagues found that making their study participants aware of geoengineering’s potential to address climate change, while making them aware also of restrictions of carbon dioxide emissions, helped to overcome the cultural polarizations that dog the climate change issue. The researchers found too that their study subjects exposed to geoengineering ideas — in particular those who more highly value individualism were slightly more concerned about the risks of climate change than those who were not exposed.
All people are prone to the cultural cognition thesis, especially those at the more extreme ends of the spectrum. But not all realize that the thesis goes both ways. For instance, the conservative writer Jonah Goldberg — who often downplays the risks from climate change (he recently wrote in the Los Angeles Times, “OK, things have gotten a wee bit warmer outside”) while advocating a geoengineering approach — accused “global warming alarmists” of advancing solutions that appeal to their core cultural values. In an interview last year with RightWing News.com, Goldberg said, “One of the reasons why conservatives are right to be suspicious of global warming is that it confirms the exact same suite of policy approaches that these people were arguing for when they were worried about a population bomb. You know, managed scarcity, throw a wet blanket on capitalism, manage the economy.” But Goldberg did not acknowledge that his own beliefs and ideology might influence his attitude and approach to the climate problem no less than those he was criticizing.
Not Without Risks
The reality is that geoengineering itself carries risks, raises difficult ethical considerations, and poses the possibility of unintended consequences, so it is not the slam-dunk first choice solution to problems posed by a warming planet.
Ironically, some of those who say climate is too complex to be forecast, or who criticize models used in climate science as being incomplete or inaccurate, seem to have no trouble advocating geoengineering quick fixes which themselves carry climate and environmental complexities, or which would require extensive modeling to understand implementation and implications.
All geoengineering schemes have unwanted side effects, and some can be significant. Solar radiation management by aerosol injection into the upper atmosphere, for instance, mimics large volcanic explosions, like the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption that caused about one degree Celsius of global surface cooling for a year or two (returning to normal over the succeeding three years).
But that eruption also caused a 10 percent drop in worldwide precipitation, because it reduced evapotranspiration rates over land, and that situation didn’t return to normal for about three years.
There are concerns too that solar radiation management would reduce the essential Asian monsoon or cause drought in Africa. A recent modeling experiment by Simone Tilmes, of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, and colleagues found regional rainfall reductions of up to 7 percent when geoengineering reduced incoming solar energy so that climate forcings were at a pre-industrial level even as atmospheric carbon dioxide levels quadrupled.
There is another large cost to geoengineering by solar radiation management: once undertaken to reduce temperatures, it must be kept up essentially forever or warming will resume in a very rapid and dangerous fashion (see figure on original post). Andrew Ross and H. Damon Matthews, in a study published in Environmental Research Letters, found that temperature would rise by up to 0.76°C in the first year after termination of a 40-year (2020 to 2059) SRM project, with up to another degree in the next two decades.
Climate engineering and the risk of rapid climate change. Andrew Ross and H Damon Matthews. 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 045103. Permission: IOP Publishing Ltd, under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA license.
Such abrupt climate change can shock ecosystems, especially affecting marine biodiversity by giving advantage to mobile or opportunistic species. It would be even more abrupt and dangerous if atmospheric carbon dioxide levels were to rise ever higher. Such threats would hang heavy over future generations, obligated to pay billions of dollars every year to continue to manage solar radiation for an increasingly out-of-kilter planet they did not create, having to carry the burdens of rapid and abrupt climate change were war, revolution, or economic distress to force a halt to the risk management effort.
And these are hardly the only reasons that geoengineering, though tempting, may not be the best solution to climate change, as scientist Alan Robock of Rutgers University wrote in his “20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea.”
Of course, not everyone sees a problem with favoring a certain solution because it aligns with their cultural values. “I think it’s laudably honest,” says Eli Lehrer, president and co-founder of the R Street Institute, a Washington-based thinktank that, in its words, “supports free markets; limited, effective government; and responsible environmental stewardship.”
“Many want to use climate change to talk about a pre-existing agenda,” says Lehrer, who accepts the scientific evidence of manmade climate change and favors a carbon tax. “They may well be right. I’d like to do it too.”
Lehrer sees geoengineering as a common sense approach deserving of research, but to be undertaken only if the problem proves severe enough. “It’s probably the best solution to an extreme situation,” he says, adding that a goal of zero carbon emissions is not achievable or “worthwhile.” He disagrees with actually doing geoengineering any time soon, calling the potential adverse impacts “extreme and potentially dangerous.”
Humans vs. Nature
Since Crutzen’s 2006 paper, geoengineering is no longer a taboo subject, feared even for polite discussion, because it can offer an alternative way out of a nagging carbon problem — bariatric surgery instead of strict dieting.
Many scientists now are seriously exploring solar radiation management and ways to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, philosophers are weighing the moral and ethical dimensions of geoengineering, and even a few environmental groups have opened their minds to concepts once considered anathema. The newly released IPCC Working Group I Fifth Assessment Report mentioned geoengineering for the first time ever.
Geoengineering solutions retain the idea of human’s technical mastery over nature. Instead of human societies changing to accommodate the natural world they rely on, climate engineering — consciously or not — is the view that nature can be fundamentally bent and manipulated to accommodate humanity. Wresting with nature is, in a very real way, the story of human development, and taming the wild world has brought some (but by no means all) wealth, relative comfort and ease, and freedom from basic wants. At the same time, that insistence on control now poses risks to the planet as the most fundamental stage on which that existence plays out.
“There is something increasingly desperate about placing more faith in technological cleverness when it is the unrelenting desire to command the natural world that has brought us to their point,” Hamilton writes in the last chapter of his book. “Unless we understand why a certain kind of rationality seems to have failed, appeals to more reason are quixotic. After all, the separation of natural and human history and the dominance of a certain form of calculative rationality were each products of the same Enlightenment process.” — end http://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2013/10/strange-bedfellows-climate-change-denial-and-support-for-geoengineering/
We can only speculate that The Heartland Institute of Chicago’s duplicitous actions are the direct result of funding by the fossil fuel industry, (big oil, coal, et al). They no longer disclose their funders to the public: “Regrettably, listing our donors in this way allowed people who disagree with our views to accuse us of being “paid” by specific donors to take positions in public policy debates, something we never do. After much deliberation and with some regret, we now keep confidential the identities of all our donors. This is standard practice by nonprofit advocacy organizations regardless of their philosophies.” http://heartland.org/funding
However, according to other sources, there is a definite monetary connection to big oil, coal, tobacco, and the pharmaceutical industry, (among others):
“The Heartland Institute does not disclose its funding sources. According to its brochures, Heartland receives money from approximately 1,600 individuals and organizations, and no single corporate entity donates more than 5% of the operating budget, although the figure for individual donors can be much higher, with a single anonymous donor providing $4.6 million in 2008, and $979,000 in 2011, accounting for 20% of Heartland’s overall budget, according to reports of a leaked fundraising plan. Heartland states that it does not accept government funds and does not conduct contract research for special-interest groups.
MediaTransparency reported that Heartland received funding from politically conservative foundations such as the Castle Rock Foundation, the Sarah Scaife Foundation, the John M. Olin Foundation, and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation.] In 2011, the Institute received $25,000 from the Charles G. Koch Foundation. The Charles Koch Foundation states that the contribution was “$25,000 to the Heartland Institute in 2011 for research in healthcare, not climate change, and this was the first and only donation the Foundation made to the institute in more than a decade”.
Oil and gas companies have contributed to the Heartland Institute, including over $600,000 from ExxonMobil between 1998 and 2005. Greenpeace reported that Heartland received almost $800,000 from ExxonMobil. In 2008, ExxonMobil said that they would stop funding to groups skeptical of climate warming, including Heartland. Joseph Bast, president of the Heartland Institute, argued that ExxonMobil was simply distancing itself from Heartland out of concern for its public image.
The Heartland Institute has also received funding and support from tobacco companies Philip Morris, Altria and Reynolds American, and pharmaceutical industry firms GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer and Eli Lilly. State Farm Insurance, USAA and Diageo are former supporters. The Independent reported that Heartland’s receipt of donations from Exxon and Philip Morris indicates a “direct link between anti-global warming skeptics funded by the oil industry and the opponents of the scientific evidence showing that passive smoking can damage people’s health”.
As of 2006, the Walton Family Foundation (run by the family of the founder of Wal-Mart) had contributed approximately $300,000 to Heartland. The Heartland Institute published an op-ed in the Louisville Courier-Journal defending Wal-Mart against criticism over its treatment of workers. The Walton Family Foundation donations were not disclosed in the op-ed, and the editor of the Courier-Journal stated that he was unaware of the connection and would probably not have published the op-ed had he known of it. The St. Petersburg Times described the Heartland Institute as “particularly energetic defending Wal-Mart.” Heartland has stated that its authors were not “paid to defend Wal-Mart” and did not receive funding from the corporation; it did not disclose the $300,000+ received from the Walton Family Foundation.
In 2012, following the February 2012 document leak and a controversial advertising campaign, the institute lost substantial funding as corporate donors sought to dissociate themselves from the institute. According to the advocacy group Forecast the Facts, Heartland lost more than $825,000, or one third of planned corporate fundraising for the year. The shortfall led to the Illinois COAL lobby sponsoring the institute’s May 2012 climate conference – the “first publicly acknowledged donations from the coal industry.” — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heartland_Institute
There is prevalent double-dipping in the crude world. For example: “BP – Deceiving The Public About Geoengineering”: http://rebelsiren.wordpress.com/2014/06/15/bp-deceiving-the-public-about-geoengineering/
ICCC3 June 2009 VIDEO: “The conference’s key message, global warming is not a crisis was delivered directly to the nation’s capitol and elected officials”.
ICCC4 July 2013 VIDEO: “Reconsidering the science and economics”.
If The Heartland Institute and BIG OIL have their way, the planet will be rendered an uninhabitable wasteland, and all life, including the human species, will be EXTINCT. Shouldn’t we take better care of our home? HOME, the documentary: http://youtu.be/jqxENMKaeCU
More about The Heartland Institute: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/heartland-institute/
The Heartland Institute of Chicago – PERPETUATING PROPAGANDA FOR MONETARY GAIN
One South Wacker Drive #2740, Chicago, IL 60606
PHONE (312) 377-4000, EMAIL firstname.lastname@example.org
PROPAGANDA formal definition:
1. derogatory information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view; “he was charged with distributing enemy propaganda”. Synonyms: information, promotion, advertising, spin, publicity; disinformation, counter-information; historical agitprop; informal info, hype, plugging; puff piece; the big lie “the prophetic novel is about a government that controls the masses by spreading propaganda”; the dissemination of propaganda as a political strategy: “the party’s leaders believed that a long period of education and propaganda would be necessary”.
Rebel Siren’s articles previously published on DD (Disinformation Directory) are being transferred to its own blog in an effort to keep information sources diverse and accessible to the public; however, for additional information about other professional disinformants, visit Disinformation Directory: http://disinformationdirectory.com/d/
This video offers extensive information to research and connections that mainstream media neglected to tell us about.
The video below is Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
Question everything, always do your own research, never believe the mainstream “spin”, they say what they are told to say by their corporate owners. Keep looking outside the mainstream, such as these two informative videos, to find real perspectives, questions, and answers, you will not find on Fox “News” or other status quo mainstream media outlets.
Meet “Serge A. Storms“, the main fictional character in Tim Dorsey’s novels (appearing in all of them to date). His name is a pun on storm surge. The Serge A. Storms referenced in this article is regarding the fake facebook page created on 7/20/14, page id#272182869636249, that to date has barely any “likes”, (not the “official page” clearly owned by the author). It is an obvious phoney page created for the sole purpose of “trolling”. We wonder how author and copyright owner, Tim A. Dorsey, might feel about that, (if he didn’t also create that fake page himself, that is).
Could it be that Tim Dorsey is using his fictional character’s name also as an unofficial fake facebook page to troll geoengineering threads, and is denying his true identity because he doesn’t want the public to know his extracurricular activity consists of selling out humanity by doing his worst to divert attention from credible information in an effort to suppress awareness? This is not an accusation, however, after our experience with physicist and business owner, Neil Pennington a.k.a. “Neil Penn”, nothing surprises us. OR, is it more likely a case of an obsessed cult troll that has stolen Tim Dorsey’s copyrighted character’s identity to use for the purpose of aiding and abetting crimes against humanity? Either way, should the fake be allowed to remain on facebook? Is it fair to the honest people on social media to allow dishonest pages to run amok, targeting and harassing others? Shouldn’t author Tim Dorsey take action to have the fake removed, if it isn’t his page?
Serge A. Storms’ antagonistic denier comments can be found on the following thread, SOCO Magazine’s facebook page, “An Air Of Danger”: https://www.facebook.com/socomagazine/photos/a.174980122806.125468.128322582806/10152315664462807/?type=1
Our researchers confronted the obvious fake, Serge A. Storms, about his true identity after discovering that the email address linked to his website is Tim A. Dorsey’s email address, yet he continues to deny he is Dorsey and “admits” he is merely a “fan” of Dorsey’s copyrighted, fictional character, Serge A. Storms, and has stolen Tim Dorsey’s copyrighted character’s name, using his website as his own, which explains why the real Tim A. Dorsey’s email address is associated with it. Storms even went so far as to make idle threats on behalf of Tim Dorsey (with a wink), leaving us wondering what gives.
However, in order to be fair and give Tim Dorsey, author, the benefit of the doubt, in case fake Serge A. Storms (with 2 likes to date) is some obsessed stalker fan that has stolen Dorsey’s copyrighted character and is illegally using his website on a fake page, separate from the “official Serge A. Storms facebook page” that is ran by the author (with considerably more “likes” than the fake), we won’t make the accusation that Tim Dorsey is using another Serge A. Storms page to troll with, we will simply provide screenshots with a brief description of our findings, then YOU, the readers, can decide. At the very least, an obsessed fan has stolen Dorsey’s copyrighted character to use it for trolling climate engineering awareness threads. Free free to comment with your “opinion”, but please be polite, hostile troll comments will not be approved and may be exploited and published for educational purpose, as our disclaimer clearly states.
Keep in mind that it is typical for the cult trolls to steal others’ identity, and are especially fond of fictional characters in literature and films, as well as fraudulently impersonating others to disparage them; since they lurk in the shadows like rats as we wrote in our piece, Portrait of a Cult, published on GeoengineeringWatch.org.
(Click screenshots to make them bigger, then back arrow to return)
If you click fake Serge A. Storms’ website (found on his facebook page “about” section), and scroll to the bottom to be able to click email and tell him “what’s on your mind”, Tim A. Dorsey’s email address comes up. The browser tab also says, Tim Dorsey, except it’s the website that fake Serge A. Storms is using as HIS website on the fake page. This is easily verifiable (the link to Dorsey’s and Storms’ website are at the bottom of the blog). Therefore, stands as evidence that the fake page is using Dorsey’s copyrighted character’s website as his own.
The real question, however, is whether it’s actually Dorsey, or a cult troll that is illegally using Dorsey’s copyrighted character’s website? If it isn’t author Tim Dorsey, he should be pleased to have the extra publicity and website traffic this blog piece might bring. However, if the author has indeed been the victim of a copyrighted identity theft, we encourage him to pursue proper channels to get the fake taken down from facebook and hold the perpetrator liable for damages.
When we clicked fake Serge A. Storms’ website in his “about” section, then clicked the website email icon, it was indeed Tim A. Dorsey’s email that comes up. Don’t take our word for it, try it yourself, go to Serge A. Storms website, click his email contact icon (pictured above), then hover over the email and you’ll see Tim A. Dorsey’s name pop up. Why is a fake page using someone else’s website and email address as their own, and getting away with it?
Below is a clear shot of Tim Dorsey’s public facebook page and email that is exactly the same email as above, when clicking on Serge A. Storms email contact link. Serge A. Storms maintains he’s a “fan of the author that stole the character’s identity“, but using the author’s same website as his own is taking it too far considering that the author could end up held liable in the future for the activities of the fake page. In that case, Tim Dorsey might be pretty upset that some crazed fan hijacked his copyrighted character’s identity, along with his website and email address.
Perhaps Tim A. Dorsey ought to file a restraining order against Serge A. Storms, except that according to our experience with Neil Penn (ington), he could actually be filing it on himself. We’re not judging or accusing, just pointing out what we have found. Either this is a case of an obsessed fan stealing copyrighted property, including the website, to use as his own, or it’s Tim Dorsey. You be the judge.
Fake Serge A. Storms shared a link by Tim A. Dorsey. Of course, it doesn’t “prove” anything since the fake may have “liked” Tim Dorsey’s page, but if so, that’s a pretty bold move since it basically announces his brazen copyright infringement to the author, (unless the fake is the author), hm, we wonder?
“University of Serge” is Tim Dorsey’s copyrighted character’s thing, but coincidentally happens to be the fake Serge A. Storms profile picture, further revealing that not only has Serge A. Storms stolen the character’s identity, but is illegally using his images, along with his website (unless of course, it turns out to be the author himself).
Is this a case of a crazed, lunatic stalker “fan” that has stolen Tim Dorsey’s copyrighted work, or another “Neil Pennington” scenario?
The official Serge A. Storms facebook page has considerably more likes than fake Serge A. Storms, and is clearly ran by Tim Dorsey as is evident when you view the third one down on the screenshot below. If you find it on facebook and click “about”, you’ll see the “official” page for Serge A. Storms, happens to be the same website the fake is using as his own.
If the fake isn’t also the author’s page, isn’t it in copyright violation according to Tim Dorsey’s disclaimer, “Serge A. Storms and Coleman Bunsen are the creative property of Tim Dorsey and William Morrow Publishers”, and subject to being held liable by Tim Dorsey for stealing his copyrighted fictional character’s identity?
Dishonesty and disinformation are running rampant on social media and it’s up to YOU to help put a stop to it. We share this earth and the activities contributing to the destruction of it must be stopped if we are going to be able to salvage what is left of our planet’s resources, and work to create sustainability for all life, rather than depleting resources, polluting our waters, soil, and skies; perpetrated by those that contract public relations companies to recruit FORUM POSTERS to make fake accounts and create debates where none exist to cast doubt to suppress awareness and prevent public outcry, in order for the profiteers of poison to continue controlling the planet and profiting at the expense of our health and atmosphere, obliterating nature and disrespecting ALL LIFE on this planet and the planet itself.
Neil Pennington a.k.a. Neil Penn, Scientist, Dirty Energy Purveyor, Facebook Troll
Originally published by Rebel Siren on DD 07-25-2014
Neil Pennington wears many hats, one of which is an active “troll” on facebook by way of a separate account with a shortened version of his name “Neil Penn”. In fact, “Neil Penn” happens to be on a list of known offenders that go around targeting people & awareness groups that he and his denier cult cronies “disagree” with, attempting to bait honest people into a debate to “prove them wrong”, disrespecting others’ right to share information; as well as, slandering leaders in the awareness movement using classic “character assassination” tactics attempting to “discredit” them in order to cast doubt on harmful aerial spraying happening globally. We have to wonder why anyone would waste valuable time harassing people on facebook?
Well, it turns out that Neil Pennington is, in fact, a purveyor of dirty, unsustainable, profit-over-people, industrial activity since he profits from performing acoustic assessments for mining (coal,/gold), fracking, drilling, etc.; given this, it’s no surprise that he is a dirty energy troll/pro-geoengineering advocate, but what IS a surprise, is the amount of time he spends on facebook seeking out and attacking others. Neil, business owner and father of three, where DO you find the time?
Below is a disallowed comment “Neil Penn” made on our article: http://rebelsiren.wordpress.com/2014 The Cult – Jim Jones’ disciples had nothing on these guys/ Again, we wonder why a “professional scientist” continues to resort to this level of immaturity, or finds the time? The last line of the comment he wrote below is slightly amusing, yet we find it disturbing that this man has any kind of clout in the world. Judging by his comment, as well as his unrelenting troll attacks on facebook, it appears that Mr. Pennington failed to learn socially acceptable graces during his vast “education”. This makes us wonder if, along with his GPA, his behavior was also a factor in why it took him so long to finally get his BS degree. This man serves as a classic example that education is not the same as intelligence.
While viewing the screenshot below, keep in mind that our “cult” article made absolutely NO reference whatsoever of “the scientific community being a cult”. To clarify, science isn’t the problem, irresponsible pseudo-science that puts profit above sustainability of the planet, is a catastrophic problem on a global scale; yet, the focus of our article is to raise awareness of the strategic troll attacks rampant on social media by the DENIER CULT (trolls/shills/brainwashed-masses) spouting text-speak about “contrail formation” disregarding actual scientific data relating to climate engineering, weather modification, or any other reality based information. Trolls demand “evidence”, then reject it when it’s presented.
Notice how Neil Penn refers to geoengineering as “the chemtrail hoax”, twisting it around in classic troll fashion. The term “shill” and “troll” are interchangeable, especially in his case. It’s too bad that Neil Penn is a willful accomplice to crimes against humanity, other than that, judging by the playful nature of his comment, he seems like a relatively fun guy. Anyone that’s an avid Monty Python fan can’t be all bad… can they? Let’s take a look.
CLICK SCREENSHOTS TO VIEW
According to his IP location, (a matter of public record), Neil Penn is based near Sydney, Australia, capital of New South Wales, not far from Newcastle, coincidentally, so is Neil Pennington, who often condescendingly boasts about his vast education and being a hot shot business owner. We have to wonder where he finds the time for such rampant troll activity? Most educated people that own businesses are far too busy providing for their families to create fake accounts and go around harassing others on social media. If we examine Neil “Penn” a bit closer, we find that he seems to have nothing but time to devote to harassing others, rather than to his family. He created a (subsequently removed) facebook “fraudster” page that targeted a well known leader in the movement to increase awareness of geoengineering, as well as contributing to several other known fake pages.
Neil Penn is suspected to also be behind the fake page that emerged on facebook immediately following the launch of Disinformation Directory. The fake has a measly amount of likes, as opposed to the real Disinformation Directory facebook page which has 680 and counting. The amount of known trolls that targeted DD’s facebook page is staggering, and Neil Penn was one of the first to appear and get banned.
Why do these “trolls” purposely seek out, target and attack others with whom they disagree? Who in their right minds operates like that? If you thought someone was a “conspiracy nutter” would you waste your valuable time seeking them out to try to prove them wrong or would you ignore them and go on about your business? Neil Penn and his accomplices exhibit blatant discrimination that should not be tolerated in social media forums.
The answer as to WHY becomes clear when we analyse their strategy (political tactics), motivation (purveyors of dirty, unsustainable science/paid forum poster shills/brainwashed deniers), and personality type (narcissistic disorder). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886914000324 AND http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/climate_desk/2014/02/internet_troll_personality_study_machiavellianism_narcissism_psychopathy.html
Neil Pennington’s public facebook profile below:
(excluding the public profile photo at the time of this publishing of his three beautiful children in the pool).
Below is “Neil Penn’s” facebook profile. Nice deep BLUE sky, Neil, photoshop much? Where do skies exist on the globe look like this anymore? Not where any of us live, that’s for sure, even if it starts out blue, within a couple of hours, is COVERED in persisting, spreading, lingering, sprayed HAZE. Could it be that this beautiful photoshopped sky helps prove his far-fetched point that global climate engineering isn’t happening on any level, including experimentation?
According to Neil Penn and the rest of the denier cult “debunkers”, experimentation isn’t possible, has never, nor ever will, happen; despite the fact that experimentation is how science works. Anyone that has ever taken basic science in school, knows that experimentation is the essential element to any scientific project, this includes climate engineering. These trolls constantly speak of “science”, yet provide NONE, with the exception of regurgitating contrail formation text-speak inapplicable to what we observe in our global skies. What do YOUR skies look like in your part of the globe?
Neil Penn and pals target anyone and everyone that they believe has any influence increasing awareness. They seek out and strategically attack their intended targets, opting to kick people when they’re down, often resorting to making things up if they can’t find anything else to exploit and pick on. These trolls openly exhibit classic bully mentality with the maturity level of a twelve year old. Neil Penn is known for his insults, name calling, and general low level troll behavior you wouldn’t expect from an “educated business owner”, unless of course, he’s a raging sociopath with too much time on his hands.
A couple of Mr. Pennington’s projects that are of public record. We wonder if Australian environmental groups were too keen on these?
Looks like there have been some serious environmental issues regarding the Dargues project:
Apparently, business is slow for Neil Penn and why he spends so much time internet trolling. We wonder if he realises this is a prosecutable offence? http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/4259/internet-trolls-can-be-prosecuted-under-australian.aspx
Primary definition of the word, “propaganda“:
1. derogatory information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view; “he was charged with distributing enemy propaganda”. Synonyms: information, promotion, advertising, publicity, spin; disinformation, counter-information; historical agitprop; informal info, hype, plugging; puff piece; the big lie “the prophetic novel is about a government that controls the masses by spreading propaganda”; the dissemination of propaganda as a political strategy: “the party’s leaders believed that a long period of education and propaganda would be necessary”.
Rebel Siren’s articles previously published on DD (Disinformation Directory) are being transferred to its own blog in an effort to keep information sources diverse and accessible to the public; however, for additional information about other professional disinformants, visit Disinformation Directory: http://disinformationdirectory.com/d/
Neil Penn is featured via this article in Disinformation Directory: http://disinformationdirectory.com/d/forum/main-forum/128-neil-pennington-a-k-a-neil-penn-scientist-dirty-energy-purveyor-facebook-troll
Update: Could Neil Penn(ington) also be behind THIS fake page below targeting and attacking Russ Tanner of Global Skywatch? https://www.facebook.com/groups/globalskywatch/
From Monty Python Life of Brian.